Share this page!

Rachel Clarke Profile picture
Twitter logo
15 Nov, 4 tweets, 2 min read
Here’s my review of @MBunting_’s fierce, passionate & beautiful book on the vital importance of care. “Labours of Love” is essential reading for doctors, nurses, carers & all of us. Just brilliant 💙 thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Fantastic, thought-provoking interview with @alisonleary1 too 👏
I think you would love this book @drkathrynmannix @Dr_N_Wiggins @Lucy_Selman @mancunianmedic
You too @dr_shibley!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rachel Clarke

Rachel Clarke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @doctor_oxford

Rachel Clarke Profile picture
8 Nov
Venture capitalist Kate Bingham is married to a Tory minister & has *no* experience in healthcare.

So @BorisJohnson made her head of his “vaccines taskforce”.

She’s spent £670k of public money on PR consultants.

Grotesque cronyism.

Screenshots below.
thetimes.co.uk/article/vaccin…
Imagine choosing to squander £670k of public funds on your own PR when there are 400 people a day dying of Covid.

Imagine being the prime minister who allows this to happen.
Read 5 tweets
Rachel Clarke Profile picture
17 Jun
It appears as though the NHS student nurses who bravely stepped up, 6 months before graduating, to help staff the pandemic have now been hung out to dry.

Surely their contracts haven’t been cancelled? Clarification needed ASAP please, @NHSEmployers @MattHancock @NHS_HealthEdEng
More student nurses speaking out on Facebook here:
Read 7 tweets
Rachel Clarke Profile picture
4 Jun
Yesterday the UK, population 66 million, had more deaths from #COVID19 than the *entire* EU, population nearly 450 million.

Not even @10DowningStreet can spin that fact away - it is utterly, irredeemably damning.
And remember, this is the situation @BorisJohnson claims he is "very proud" of. This absolute debacle.
theguardian.com/politics/2020/…
* Thank you @bbcnewsnight @nicholaswatt for the graphic I shared above
Read 4 tweets
Rachel Clarke Profile picture
30 May
This is a grossly irresponsible tweet. You know full well multiple causes of a death can be certified. And yet - as hearsay, no evidence - you allege NHS doctors are breaking the law to miscertify patient deaths. This is so unprofessional. Report to @gmcuk if genuine concerns.
For those concerned by this tweet, death certificates allow multiple illnesses to be recorded as causes of death. When a cancer patient dies from Covid-19, one or both conditions may be included, depending on the nature and level of the contribution to the death caused by each.
Doctors take the job of completing death certificates immensely seriously & weight very carefully indeed which conditions to include and why. These are legal documents of enormous importance to families. Getting it right matters to us deeply.
Read 5 tweets
Rachel Clarke Profile picture
25 Apr
@TorButlerCole but David isn't this what Tor is getting at, your comment here: "it was always the case that care home residents were frail, with multiple life limiting long term conditions, physical dependence, and cognitiive impairment/dementia and generally in the last phase of their lives"
@TorButlerCole because though this is likely to be true for many elderly care home residents, it by no means isn't always if you are a young resident with a disability? and the conflation of care home with elderly may lead to erroneous assumptions re: appropriateness of CPR
@TorButlerCole not that I would ever suggest you would make them, of course - I know you wouldn't - but others might...
Read 4 tweets
Rachel Clarke Profile picture
21 Apr
Note how @matthancock is trying to reframe the 100k tests per day target.

Now he refers to 'testing capacity', citing 40k/day - despite only 18k actual tests yesterday.

But 'capacity' doesn't just mean lab space. It means people to do the tests. (1/3)

bbc.co.uk/news/health-52…
'Capacity' means the swabs, the reagents, the lab staff and - crucially - the testers, people physically reaching suspected cases, getting the tests actually done.

According to Hancock, the small matter of getting the test to the case appears entirely irrelevant. (2/3)
But carers & NHS staff spread all over the country can't always drive to a testing centre that's many miles away.

So where is the testing workforce, @matthancock?

And why are you talking in magical & misleading 'capacity' terms? (3/3)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @doctor_oxford