The intellectual retreat of Liberalism is a global phenomenon. It's success in hindsight may have been contingent on the unprecedented affluence of Western societies from the decades following ww2 to the collapse of the Soviet Union. Stagnation and decay

chinaheritage.net/journal/adieu-…
for the last two decades have lead many to challenge previously assumed universals. For China, the shift was not because of immiseration, to the contrary the last two decades have witnessed unprecedented prosperity, yet the values of China's intellectual boomers, those who most
slavishly aped the West in all things have been left behind by the Chinese mainstream who have developed a civilizational self confidence engendered by strength that the eunuch compradors who simply lacked the balls to comprehend. To a class, those who rage against the Party's
resurgence under Xi aren't rebels or iconoclasts, to the contrary they were the pet intellectuals in their 60's the state cultivated who discovered that their ideology is past it's due date. Cai Xia, Fan Fan, this Zha woman were the thwarted intellectuals, the former teenage red
guards and disaffected would be lumpen red aristocrats. The hilarious joke of these useless group of people is that they have transfered their fanatical loyalty of their youth from Mao to a new personality cult of Trump in their dottage.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Duke of Qin

Duke of Qin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @qin_duke

16 Nov
There is actually an interesting parallel between Chinese dissident liberals and the Anglophone Indian elite that I think many are unaware of. They are both from classes of great socio-economic privilege, extreme Anglophiles, and utterly out of touch with the mainstream of their
own societies. The greatest difference is that the Anglophone Indian elites have historically ruled India and still continue to dominate it's upper class via prestige while the Chinese dissident liberals are a tiny despised minority who have never had any power whatsoever. Also
while the Indians are merely out of touch with their own society, they are extremely adept in navigating the cultural trends and patterns that dominate the West. The Chinese dissident liberal is a true political and social orphan. Not only is he in dissonance with his homeland
Read 5 tweets
15 Nov
Journalists... Every single time. I'm reminded of @dylanleviking tweet about just how deliberately myopic English language translation of Chinese is. Cultivated ignorance of what is actually relevant to favor what panders to their priors. The raft of usual suspects with their
Twitter bios filled with descriptors such policy analyst, research fellow, indo-pacific, the whole stew of DC funded acronyms are leaping to this man's defence. This is actually how elite concensus is created in the West, various government paid shills circle jerk one to create
an established cannon even though the fundamental premise is nonsense but because everyone possess the right affiliation or credentials, it has to be true. Like the pile of ants gradually swarming to their deaths in a tight circle because they've lost the scent, except in this
Read 4 tweets
8 Nov
What American "weakness" actually means and what people think it means. There is a great divergence here in definitions that is critical to understanding balance of power relations and Chinese perceptions of American vulnerability that I think Americans simply do not understand.
This is particularly notable when reading what the DC strategic circus has to say about the topic, whether from the left or right since there is actually marginal difference here. When some interchangeable think tank, journalists, or bureaucrat in the security services writes
about American weakness, they are actually primarily deploying it as a rhetorical weapon against domestic weakness, because what they are not actually analyzing is American capabilities, but rather the meta-coherence of the wide American propaganda network. When the DC blob
Read 12 tweets
26 Oct
"Why aren't the Islamist head hoppers we have been cultivating for decades biting the targets we want anymore?!" cries the Anglo Imperialist.
The real answer is that China doesn't have troops occupying random Muslim nations nor does it gratuitously insult Muslims while simultaneously pandering to them. It's a simple thing called respect. You can kill a man, but to humiliate is even worse. Liberalisms inability to deal
with sectarianism or it's burdensome Muslim minorities arises from the fact it mistakes symbolism for action. It routinely insults and degrades Muslims because it is unable to truly rule them. Mohammed cartoons and similar stunts are puerile and serve no purpose beyond incitement
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct
Interesting 4D chess theory of Guo Wengui, Yan Limeng, etc being Chinese double agents to poison the well of American anti-China attitudes. I.e. to attach the movement to a hated and discredited domestic rival, Bannon/Trump which instinctively sets the elite opinion against it as
well as rolling out the most stupid and easily debunked theories so that further revelations is instinctively dismissed out of hand. This doesn't seem very plausible to me because 1) it is a very subtle influence operation and 2) anti-Party Chinese activists are that stupid and
dishonest as a rule. The party isn't good at this kind of subtle propaganda game and more critically isn't isn't particularly useful because the US propaganda game is much more powerful and can shift attitudes on a dime if desired so even if this was a Chinese plot, it is one
Read 4 tweets
19 Oct
This is either incredibly based or incredibly dishonest depending on whether you chose to believe it is true. The reality, like always is a little more complex. The party has publicly been encouraging intermarriages, via financial subsidies for newly married couples.
Inter ethnic marriages had been on a downward trend according to the 2010 census. Uighur-Han interrmarriages are only 1% of household (5% for Kazakh-Han marriages) which had been a substantial decline since 2000. This is emblematic of the attempt at social withdraw from the
wider Chinese state-society by Uighur society as a whole. The reaction by the Party can be seen as an expansion of the state to reabsorb them back into the mainstream, i.e. any attempt at social separatism won't be tolerated. The idea that you can just wander into Xinjiang and
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!