Despite Trump's tweets today, the campaign is NOT pressing forward with the argument that GOP observers were prevented from meaningfully watching the counting process.
They filed an amended complaint with Microsoft Word's track changes feature: dropbox.com/s/ev6nac59w8lc…
They filed an amended complaint with Microsoft Word's track changes feature: dropbox.com/s/ev6nac59w8lc…
This is in the federal Pennsylvania lawsuit.
That leaves just the cured ballots issue, as I discussed in this thread last week:
I haven't seen the numbers on this, but it's hard to see how throwing out cured ballots in just four counties is going to change the outcome.
I haven't seen the numbers on this, but it's hard to see how throwing out cured ballots in just four counties is going to change the outcome.
https://twitter.com/gabrielmalor/status/1325964773465464832
This is the heart of the cured ballot allegations.
The theory is that these concededly accurate votes should not be counted because certain GOP-heavy counties declined to notify voters that their mail-in ballots were invalid while four Dem-heavy counties did.
The theory is that these concededly accurate votes should not be counted because certain GOP-heavy counties declined to notify voters that their mail-in ballots were invalid while four Dem-heavy counties did.
In addition to the other problems with this theory (see prior thread QTed above), I don't see how to identify *just* the putatively improperly cured ballots.
At this point they're just provisional ballots, how do you sort okay provisional ballots from the bad ones?
At this point they're just provisional ballots, how do you sort okay provisional ballots from the bad ones?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
