If you’re wondering about the UK Parliament’s role in ratifying the EU-UK future relationship treaty, there’s a handy guide here from the House of Commons Library commonslibrary.parliament.uk/uk-parliaments…
2/ But to save you the trouble, I’ve summarised it here.
3/ Firstly, it’s the UK govt, not parliament, which negotiates a treaty under its prerogative power. These powers are subject to some constraints. The Constitutional Reform & Governance Act (CRAG) gives parliament a limited role in ratifying treaties
4/ A copy of the treaty must be laid before parliament so MPs, Lords and committees can take an informed view. Under section 20 of CRAG there’s a period of 21 sitting days one day after receipt of the treaty (both houses must be sitting) for scrutiny
5/ Parliament can pass a resolution to reject to ratification. A minister can extend the 21 day period but Parliament cannot force that. The Lords can’t block or delay ratification; if it passes a resolution to that effect the govt can proceed anyway, provided it explains why
6/ If the Commons passes a resolution against ratification within the 21 day period it can delay the process, but the govt can keep resetting the 21 day period to make further attempts to ratify (neither house has attempted this since CRAG came into effect)
7/ CRAG doesn’t guarantee a debate or vote in either house before ratification - that’s up to the govt or, eg, a motion being moved on a designated Opposition day
8/ Say the govt lays the treaty on Wed 18 Nov and Parliament sat every Mon-Thur up to Christmas Eve, the treaty could be ratified on Christmas Day and come into force by the end of the transition (2300hr GMT Dec 31). If a deal is reached later, Fri, Sat and Sundays wd be needed
9/ CRAG allows the govt to speed up ratification in “exceptional” circumstances under Section 22, ie by dispensing with Section 20. This cannot be used if either House has resolved against ratification as laid before Parliament under CRAG
10/ If the EU and UK only reach a deal in late Nov/early Dec that could make it harder for the UK to ratify before the transition ends. The govt could use Section 22 (“exceptional circumstances”) but it would leave Parliament less time to scrutinise and even prevent a vote
11/ The govt could also use primary legislation to shorten the ratification process, ie giving Parliament the opportunity to disapply CRAG, meaning ratification depends on the speed with which the govt can pass the bill, rather than on CRAG
12/ David Frost told the Lords EU Committee in Oct that he assumed there would be primary legislation to implement “at least some of” any of the treaty’s provisions in UK law
13/ Even if Section 22 is invoked or CRAG is disapplied, there could still be debates, to give the govt political cover - the govt has yet to indicate its intentions, and a timetable might only be forthcoming when a treaty is agreed in principle
14/ So, ultimately the UK has more discretion when it comes to time running out than the EU side. The European Parliament must ratify the treaty and the plenary date is Dec 14. The EP will want votes on the treaty in a number of committees
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's an update ahead of the Brexit negotiations resuming in Brussels:
1/ The main obstacles remain fisheries, the level playing field and governance. The big sticking point has shifted to the so-called evolution or "ratchet" clauses in the non-regression provisions, ie that both sides evolve their standards in tandem over time...
2/ In particular the UK is resisting the ability for either side to retaliate if they depart from the level playing field. The fact that the "baseline" remains the standards both sides operate on Jan 1 - ie, EU-level standards, also remains an issue for London.
Some important advice from John O'Loughlin of @PwC ahead of January 1 2021 during a webcast alongside @GavinBarwell@carinbryans and @mcgeedavid. Basically any Irish companies which export to the UK or import from the UK should know the following:
2/ "At a minimum you need a EORI number, the equivalent of a VAT number, you need that to lodge a customs declaration. The people that lodge a customs declaration aren’t the company themselves nor is it someone like PWC, but it’s a customs agent...
3/ "They file and prepare the documentation..., you need to engage the services of a customs broker, have a mechanism to pay the customs duty and the right information and documentation to support tthe importation of those goods.
Response from European Commission spokes @DanielFerrie to the joint letter from @DUPleader and @moneillsf on food consignments to NI supermarkets under the NI Protocol:
2/ “We can confirm receipt of a letter from the First Minister and Deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland on the issue of agri-food goods brought into Northern Ireland from the rest of the UK. We will reply to this letter shortly.
3/ “The Withdrawal Agreement’s Protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland prevents the return of a hard border on the island of Ireland. It protects peace, stability and prosperity, North-South cooperation and the integrity of the EU Single Market.
Breaking: The DUP and Sinn Fein leaders have sent a joint letter to the European Commission describing as “unacceptable” the alleged threat to the continuity of existing food supplies to Northern supermarkets once the Northern Ireland Protocol takes effect.
2/ The letter, seen by @rtenews, and signed by @DUPleader and @moneillsf, highlights the problem of the need for checks and controls on food products entering Northern Ireland from Great Britain from January 1 and how that might impact on the supply of food to supermarket chains.
3/ The First/Dep First Ministers write: “It is hard to imagine a more fundamental aspect of everyday life than the purchase of daily food supplies...
Here is the rough transcript and story of @realDonaldTrump's NI envoy, his meeting with @simoncoveney and the alleged threat of the EU using aviation as leverage over the UK if the Internal Market Bill led to a hard border on the island of Ireland.
2/ Mr Mulvaney was talking to the @iiea via video link.
Asked about the concerns in the US over the IMB, which breaches the NI Protocol, Mr Mulvaney said that in his meetings with all sides his worry was that the Bill could result in a border “by accident”.
3/ He told the presentation: “The best response I got on the matter was from Simon Coveney when I met with him in Dublin.
New: @MichelBarnier has given a "very downbeat" briefing to EU ambassadors on the state of play in the Brexit negotiations, @rtenews understands
2/ While there has been good progress on police and judicial cooperation, there has been no progress at all on the level playing field, fisheries and governance.
3/ In some of these areas Mr Barnier told diplomats that the UK had gone backwards on earlier understandings, such as the idea of a robust independent competition authority in the UK