Thread.
What’s 41.18(d)? It’s a City of LA ordinance that makes it illegal to sit, sleep, and lie down on the sidewalk in LA.

Q: Isn’t 41.18 unconstitutional?
A: Yes! Martin v Boise decided that a total ban on sitting, sleeping, and lying down is unconstitutional
...because it violates the 8th amendment (cruel and unusual punishment). BUT cities can still impose restrictions in other ways, like restricting people from sleeping under freeway overpasses, for example. Since 41.18 is unconstitutional, LA does not enforce it.
To make 41.18 constitutional, City Council has to tweak it. That’s what @BobBlumenfield is attempting to do by repealing the current version of 41.18 and replacing it with what he believes is constitutional, making it illegal to sleep around freeways and homeless services.
Mike Feuer got too excited about criminalizing homelessness that he went beyond Bob’s motion and drafted an ordinance making it illegal to sleep anywhere in public space as long as you’re “offered shelter.” When his draft was presented to City Council, even Bob balked.
Bob proposed striking down Mike’s idea to keep it limited to what he originally proposed, which is still very bad. Thanks to #ServicesNotSweeps, allied orgs, and Angelenos who organized against this, City Council failed to get enough votes to pass it. servicesnotsweeps.com/41-18-letter/
.@CD6Nury was furious that it failed to pass and agendized it again for Nov 24. Typically, ordinances take forever to make it through committee and report backs, but in this instance, City Council tried to pass it in one week from the day it got introduced to the day of the vote
This is remarkably undemocratic and reveals that actually, City Council can move quickly if they really want to - the only reason they couldn’t is because so many people spoke up against it.

What’s next?
City Council will vote on this on Nov 24. We don’t know what will happen.
We do know that we have a good track record of winning when we do fight. We need everyone’s help to defeat this criminalization motion. Go to ServicesNotSweeps.com and submit written comment and bombard your council member with emails and phone calls.
Tomorrow night, the Venice Neighborhood Council will vote on supporting the 41.18 motion and will hear from Councilman Joe Buscaino on his motion to resume sweeps throughout LA. Call into the Zoom meeting at 7pm to oppose criminalization:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ktown for All 💜❤

Ktown for All 💜❤ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KtownforAll

29 Oct
We appreciate the voices on the city council who spoke up in opposition to yesterday's homeless criminalization motion. It has been a long fight to get councilmembers to acknowledge the harm caused by over-policing houseless people.
They questioned the urgency of this motion, and why that same urgency hasn't been present in efforts to house people. They acknowledged that arrests and sweeps make it harder for people to connect to the few services we do have available.
Importantly, they also acknowledged that enforcement strategies have already been tried, and they've consistently failed. We need to put real resources behind programs that work. Stop letting pilot programs languish. Stop focusing on shiny new things and get creative.
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct
For today, we won!

The majority of council did not support the motion and sent it back to committee. This fight will come back, but public pressure stopped the council from moving forward today. Jamming this through in just a few days during a busy election season failed.
As the meeting closed, they moved to continue this discussion on November 24th, so this fight is far from over. We need to keep the pressure on council, because they will try this again in 4 weeks.
Thanks to everyone who called, emailed, and otherwise spoke out against this backwards motion. In a matter of days, the people spoke up and shut it down. Criminalization is not a solution to homelessness. #HomesNotZones #ServicesNotSweeps
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
Today, City Council will discuss a measure creating a partnership with St. Vincent’s Medical Center to provide services to low-income and unhoused Angelenos. This feels like a great measure and we support expanded services, but we can't ignore the troubling connections behind it. Image
St. Vincent is owned by LA Times owner, Patrick Soon-Shiong who bought it in 2018. As it went bankrupt in 2020, the LA Times provided significant coverage of the hospital’s closure, including a column by Lopez calling on the City to turn the facility into homeless housing. 2/9 Image
Next up, Steve Lopez. Lopez writes frequently on issues of homelessness in Los Angeles. Too often however, his depictions of homelessness tend towards the sensational and dehumanizes the unhoused. 3/9 la.streetsblog.org/2019/11/23/hom…
Read 9 tweets
28 Feb
Good morning - we're here at the Convening on the Justice Guarantee in San Francisco, hosted by @Justice_Collab and organized by @ChatfieldKate.

Very excited for a day discussing criminalization, housing, and structural racism in the justice system. Stay tuned for highlights!
The convening is at Manny's, which offers a nicely curated collection of books in addition to some excellent grub.
Opening remarks from @ChatfieldKate. 2.2 million incarcerated people and hundreds of thousands of unhoused people need a Justice Guarantee rooted in dignity. "We must move away from the false narrative that jails and prisons are the answer."
Read 90 tweets
23 Jan
Our members have been calling @MitchOFarrell's office and asking important questions about the upcoming sweeps at Echo Park. We've learned that CD13 shelters are currently at capacity. Police are about to remove dozens of people from the area with no plan as to where they'll go.
When members spoke to staffers, they gave confusing and contradictory information about where to direct people. Suggested shelters were far away and inaccessible to people in the Echo Park area.
In just the past few weeks we've seen a major uptick in anti-homeless enforcement actions, and extreme confusion among the city employees doing the enforcement. The city is pushing practices that make unhoused people's lives more difficult, and they're doing it incompetently.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!