Yep. This is exactly what I’ve been saying since the pandemic began. Anyone who’s followed the antivaccine movement can immediately spot the similarities between #COVID19 denial and antivax disinformation.
The only change I’d make is one of emphasis. The antivaccine movement is based at its heart on a conspiracy theory that vaccines are harmful/don’t work but “they” (CDC, medical profession, big pharma, etc.) are “suppressing” that forbidden knowledge.
#COVID19 denial is based on a similar conspiracy theory that COVID is engineered/not that deadly/plot to impose vaccination, but that “they” (CDC, deep state, public health infrastructure, etc.) are “suppressing” that knowledge.
The examples in the antivax world are numerous. Indeed, @delbigtree and @DrWakefield’s VAXXED was based on the #CDCwhistleblower conspiracy theory, which claimed that the CDC was covering up evidence that MMR increased the risk of autism in African-American boys.
Before that, in 2005, @RobertKennedyJr promoted the Simpsonwood conspiracy theory that claimed that—you guessed it!—the CDC covered up evidence that thimerosal in vaccines caused autism.
Indeed, pretty much all science denial is rooted in conspiracy theories in which scientists are portrayed as “suppressing” evidence supporting their denial. /end
Oh, one other thing. I don’t know if I I could’ve subjected myself to so many hours of @delbigtree without risking alcohol poisoning from the amount of scotch that would’ve been required to endure his ranting. So kudos to @doritmi and @aetiology for their constitutions.😂
And I say this as someone who watched @vaxxedthemovie and both @plandemicseries movies.😂

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Gorski, MD, PhD

David Gorski, MD, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gorskon

24 Oct
This is why science deniers deny. They want to give the impression that there is an actual legitimate “debate” over scientific conclusions supported by mountains of evidence; e.g., climate change, vaccines, the ineffectiveness of alternative medicine, evolution, etc. 1/
In other areas of science not as well settled (e.g., #COVID19), they seek to undermine current scientific consensus by vastly exaggerating the evidence behind minority and fringe positions and mischaracterizing and minimizing evidence in support of current consensus. 2/
They then add to this technique conspiracy theories to “explain” why the fringe science is dismissed and not taken seriously by relevant experts and fake experts (plus the odd real expert turned fringe) to give the appearance of authority to fringe viewpoints. 3/
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Because they're mostly not scientists, and few of the actual scientists are epidemiologists, and because they are spewing disinformation. #barringtondeclaration is propaganda, not science. 1/
#COVID19 deniers and conspiracy theorists are taking a page from a old crank playbook. Does anyone remember "Scientific Dissent from Darwinism" and "Physicians and Surgeons Who Dissent from Darwinism"? These were similar "declarations" against evolution and for creationism. 2/
Or what about the open letter by the "Group for the Scientific Reappraisal of the HIV-AIDS Hypothesis" calling for a "thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against this hypothesis [HIV-AIDS] be conducted by a suitable independent group"? 3/ sidasante.com/contacts/group…
Read 5 tweets
22 Jul
Dumbest idea ever: A vaccine "debate" between two lawyers, @AlanDersh and @RobertKennedyJr, neither of whom has significant scientific knowledge about vaccines, and one of whom is rabidly antivaccine. 1/ ageofautism.com/2020/07/vaccin…
This sort of nonsense is what I like to call, "All Truth Comes from Live Public Debate." It's a favorite crank trope that serves two purposes. 2/ respectfulinsolence.com/2013/04/26/all…
Basically, this tactic serves two purposes for the crank. First, it allows cranks to appear on the same stage/venue as seemingly an equal to an actual authority, thus giving the appearance that their viewpoint is worth serious consideration scientifically or based on evidence. 3/
Read 6 tweets
22 Jun
@thereal_truther @hbhbglenn1 @Melissa08972285 @delbigtree @uTobian It's also a 20-year-old conspiracy theory that we old timers demolished when @RobertKennedyJr first published it almost exactly 15 years ago today. Let's just put it this way. The transcript doesn't show any conspiracy or coverup or data manipulation. skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005/…
@thereal_truther @hbhbglenn1 @Melissa08972285 @delbigtree @uTobian @RobertKennedyJr I read the whole thing back in the day, and let's just say that I was underwhelmed by it as evidence of any sort of malfeasance. What I saw were scientists soberly addressing a concern and examining the evidence. oracknows.blogspot.com/2005/06/skepti…
@thereal_truther @hbhbglenn1 @Melissa08972285 @delbigtree @uTobian @RobertKennedyJr I also examined @RobertKennedyJr's conspiracyfest of an article that popularized the Simpsonwood conspiracy theory. It was full of cherry-picking, unsupported assertions, and, yes, conspiracy mongering. oracknows.blogspot.com/2005/06/salonc…
Read 11 tweets
29 May
So there's a new disinformation campaign going around about masks in which @FoxNews and its sycophants, toadies, and lackeys cite @WHO recommendations that only people who are sick or who are taking care of patients with #COVID19 should wear a mask. 1/ foxnews.com/world/who-guid…
The headline of the article seems to imply that the recommendation is new, but the videos on the @WHO website linked to date back to early March and February. This part gives the game away: “The recommendation has not changed…” 2/
Some outlets, like @NYPost, ran the story and didn't even acknowledge that the @WHO recommendation is at least three months old, cutting out the part about the recommendation not having changed. 3/ nypost.com/2020/05/28/hea…
Read 5 tweets
11 May
This is not new. It has actually been a long time coming. I've been writing about how antivaxxers have coopted far right rhetoric and have been becoming more extreme. Unfortunately #COVID19 has accelerated the process. 1/
For instance, in the 2016 election @delbigtree visited Michigan and ranted on about standing and, if necessary, dying for freedom, as his group went around buttonholing state legislators. 2/ respectfulinsolence.com/2016/10/28/nob…
Before that, Bigtree was on video saying "Now's the time for guns." 3/ respectfulinsolence.com/2016/07/20/the…
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!