This is yet another Devin Nunes defamation special, in which all the statements are true but they IMPLY he's a nefarious weasel. Image
Oddly enough, one of Nunes' complaints is that he's saying he NEVER said Obama spied on Trump. Image
Here's a video of Devin Nunes saying that Obama spied on Trump.

There were no news reports of a surreptitious visit to get files, Nunes says, footnoting a news report of that visit, but saying it was written by liars. ImageImage
Oh. It looks like there's another news report describing a late in the evening excursion to get files, but it's ALSO written by liars and sourced to liars, including evil Democrats and therefore the writers MUST have known not to rely on them. Image
Nunes basically says there's malice because he said Obama spied on the Trump campaign, not the Trump Tower, and because his press person told the reporter the story was not accurate and he printed it anyway, relying on "inherently unreliable sources" like Adam Schiff. ImageImage
I mean, Nunes says, constantly, that the Trump campaign was spied on, but this apparently, is a bridge too far. Image
Nunes didn't sue about any of this back in 2017, and I'm guessing it's because he didn't want to risk discovery while Trump was President,

This lawsuit is a concession. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrew Fleischman

Andrew Fleischman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ASFleischman

20 Nov
Watching these Sidney Powell press conferences, I'm reminded of a Supreme Court of Georgia case that almost certainly went the wrong way, in which the Court held it was constitutional to punish someone for pretending to be a serial killer on YouTube. /1 Image
He was posting these bizarre videos with his face and voice distorted, and promising to confess to a variety of murders under the name "catchmekiller". And since, of course, he hadn't killed anyone, he was charged with GA's false statement law. /2 Image
He argued that a conviction under this statute violated his First Amendment rights, and the Court agreed that if all you had to do was make a false statement and have it be in a court's jurisdiction, it would be unconstitutional. But they read it a bit more narrowly. /3 Image
Read 9 tweets
17 Nov
OAN is a remarkable "news" network.
Louie Gohmert just straight up lying to voters.
You can watch the segment here, if you dare:

Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
Sidney Powell claims she spoke to an anonymous "high-ranking military officer" and then reads off an "affidavit" than claims that a system was used to affect elections in Venezuala in 2006.

I think this is the Kraken?
She is "FURIOUS" that no one is doing anything about the elections in Venezuala in 2006.

Lou Dobbs says the FBI now has an investigative team "looking into" this election.

theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/11/17/sid…
Dobbs calls it the "WORST ELECTION IN AMERICAN HISTORY" which may come as a surprise to some folks from the 19th century.

Powell claims this "smartmatic software" is part of all voting software in the country.

Dobbs: "THANK GOD WE HAVE A PRESIDENT WHO WILL STAY IN THE FIGHT"
Read 6 tweets
17 Nov
Wait. Are these people offering to let me PAY to teach people how to do appeals?

Tom Sawyer could take a page from these fine people.
Anyone who is dumb enough to PAY for the PRIVILEGE of doing a presentation on the thing they are BEST at should be driven into the wilderness with brooms and whips.
I quoted my speaking fee and they clarified that no, I would definitely be the one paying THEM.

My proposed counteroffer is that I will allow them to watch my children next week for only $3000.00.
Read 6 tweets
16 Nov
A Trump lawsuit in three parts:

1. We PROMISE we will find evidence

2. Where is the evidence?

3. Ok we're dismissing

||democracydocket.com/cases/ga-democ…
The above tweet was about Georgia, but it's happening all over.

Here is again out of PA, with identical language:

democracydocket.com/cases/pennsylv…

1. We promise to find evidence.
2. We're dismissing because there's no evidence
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!