Today's hearing is unusual in that a federal judge, Carol Amon, has ordered the acting US attorney in Brooklyn to appear in court personally.
That prosecutor, Seth DuCharme, worked closely in Washington DC with AG William Barr before he took over the Brooklyn office.
It's impossible to know what Judge Amon will ask DuCharme but one imagines it'll be a version of the question, "What happened?"
Yesterday DuCharme sent the judge a letter, at 1st under seal, saying case was dropped b/c of "sensitive & important foreign policy considerations."
We're on in Brooklyn federal court.
Judge Amon is on the bench.
Gen. Cienfuegos, in a dark suit, has entered the courtroom from his holding cell.
Sitting w/him is his lawyer, Edward Sapone.
DuCharme reiterates that the "office stands behind the case." He doesn't doubt strength of the case.
It was "the balancing of the interests" of the prosecution against the interests of "US relationship with Mexico" particularly where it comes to law enforcement.
Amon asks if this decision was made "at the highest level of the Justice Department."
DuCharme agrees that it was made by AG Barr himself.
Sapone says Cienfuegos consents to the motion to dismiss the charges. (well, yeah...)
DuCharme, facing questions about sealing documents related to this process, says he has tried to be "sensitive" to the interests of Cienfuegos as well as the government.
Judge Amon seems to want everything unsealed--including what's known as "a removal agreement."
Sapone confirms he has gone through the removal agreement w/Cienfuegos. Cienfuegos has agreed to it and signed it.
Judge Amon rules that the removal agreement will be unsealed after the hearing.
She is now asking Cienfuegos a few quick questions.
Does he understand the removal agreement? Yes.
He will be bound by it if she grants it. He understands.
The agreement, she notes, states that Cienfuegos will leave the US expeditiously in the custody of the US Marshals.
Judge Amon asks if he agrees that he has no fear of persecution in Mexico. He does agree.
Judge Amon, granting the government's request, formally dismisses the indictment against Cienfuegos.
She notes the decision was made at the highest level of the DOJ in order to let Mexico investigate and uphold "the strong law enforcement partnership" b/t US and Mexico.
She notes there's no evidence of bad faith or any suspicion that Mexico will not in fact conduct an investigation.
Hearing adjourned. Out.
According to Gen. Cienfuegos' removal agreement, which was just unsealed, the US government agreed to drop the charges on Monday.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 15 minutes or so, a hearing will begin in federal court in Atlanta in a lawsuit seeking to halt certification of the vote in Georgia. Here’s a quick primer on the case.
The suit, filed by the lawyer L Lin Wood, alleges that the vote in GA was “suspect and tainted with impropriety” largely by how elections officials handled absentee/mail-in ballots.
Wood says the problems stem from an agreement reached in March b/t the GA secretary of state & the state’s Dem party which essentially strengthened the procedure for verifying mail-ins. He claims that agreement violated state law.
NEW: Trump campaign voluntarily dismisses its federal suit in Michigan seeking to invalidate the Wayne County vote results.
This follows a voluntarily dismissal of a similar suit in Michigan yesterday.
The Trump campaign and its proxies have now lost or withdrawn from all of their major legal efforts in Michigan.
The Michigan Supreme Court is still considering an appeal by the campaign of a loss in a state suit that closely mirrored the federal suit that was dumped today.
Weird thing about the federal dismissal:
In the notice the lawyer notes--in what seems like a political not legal point--that the Wayne County Board of Canvassers declined to certify the vote. But the board DID certify the vote.
After, 2 GOP members tried to rescind their votes.
NEW: Wow.
US Justice Department under AG William Barr is dropping charges against Salvador Cienfuegos, ex-defense minister of Mexico so that he can be charged in Mexico.
New:
It's official.
Rudy has been approved to appear in the Pennsylvania election case.
If all goes according to schedule, we're moments from beginning the hearing in Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar (the PA secretary of state).
A quick cast of characters:
The judge is Matthew Brann, who was appointed by President Obama in 2012. Before taking the bench Judge Brann was a lawyer in private practice and, interestingly, a Republican party official in Pennsylvania.
New: Here's a quick look at what to expect at this afternoon's federal election case hearing in Pennsylvania--and at the legal snafus the case has already been through. nytimes.com/live/2020/11/1…
The Trump's campaign chief argument here is that PA elections officials violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
The reason? In some Dem counties, officials alerted voters that their mail-in ballots needed fixing while that didn't happen in some GOP counties.
Lawyers for the Dems have countered:
It's not the fault of Dem counties that allowed voters to fix (or "cure") their ballots if GOP counties didn't do that.
They argue that the Trump campaign should have sued those counties but did not.
Lawyers for the Trump campaign's Pennsylvania lawsuit have withdrawn from the case on the eve of the first hearing in the case.
This move follows the withdrawal on Friday of the lawyers who initially filed the suit.
With no lawyers left to argue its case, the Trump case has asked the judge to postpone tomorrow's hearing...
Ouch.
The federal judge overseeing the PA case, Matthew Brann, has just denied the Trump campaign's request to delay tomorrow's hearing.
It will go on as scheduled.