NEW: Trump campaign voluntarily dismisses its federal suit in Michigan seeking to invalidate the Wayne County vote results.
This follows a voluntarily dismissal of a similar suit in Michigan yesterday.
The Trump campaign and its proxies have now lost or withdrawn from all of their major legal efforts in Michigan.
The Michigan Supreme Court is still considering an appeal by the campaign of a loss in a state suit that closely mirrored the federal suit that was dumped today.
Weird thing about the federal dismissal:
In the notice the lawyer notes--in what seems like a political not legal point--that the Wayne County Board of Canvassers declined to certify the vote. But the board DID certify the vote.
After, 2 GOP members tried to rescind their votes.
Here's Rudy's statement on the dismissal of the Michigan federal lawsuit.
He's saying...they won because the board of canvassers didn't certify the vote. Even though they did.
Giuliani "is just plain wrong," says David Fink, lead lawyer for the city of Detroit.
Here's Fink on the board of canvassers situation:
"The belated attempt to rescind a vote after the vote has been taken and the board has acted is legally meaningless."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'll be following a hearing in Nevada challenging the vote in Clark County & seeking a new election there.
The Trump campaign isn't involved. Case was brought by a failed GOP candidate for congress Jim Marchant.
But if successful it could help Trump by delaying certification.
Lawyer for Marchant is objecting--in a highly unusual way--to a pro hac vice motion by lawyers for DNC saying this is a local case.
"This is not a matter of national interest," he says.
Marchant is also objecting overall to the DNC intervening in the case at all.
In 15 minutes or so, a hearing will begin in federal court in Atlanta in a lawsuit seeking to halt certification of the vote in Georgia. Here’s a quick primer on the case.
The suit, filed by the lawyer L Lin Wood, alleges that the vote in GA was “suspect and tainted with impropriety” largely by how elections officials handled absentee/mail-in ballots.
Wood says the problems stem from an agreement reached in March b/t the GA secretary of state & the state’s Dem party which essentially strengthened the procedure for verifying mail-ins. He claims that agreement violated state law.
NEW: Wow.
US Justice Department under AG William Barr is dropping charges against Salvador Cienfuegos, ex-defense minister of Mexico so that he can be charged in Mexico.
New:
It's official.
Rudy has been approved to appear in the Pennsylvania election case.
If all goes according to schedule, we're moments from beginning the hearing in Donald J. Trump for President v. Boockvar (the PA secretary of state).
A quick cast of characters:
The judge is Matthew Brann, who was appointed by President Obama in 2012. Before taking the bench Judge Brann was a lawyer in private practice and, interestingly, a Republican party official in Pennsylvania.
New: Here's a quick look at what to expect at this afternoon's federal election case hearing in Pennsylvania--and at the legal snafus the case has already been through. nytimes.com/live/2020/11/1…
The Trump's campaign chief argument here is that PA elections officials violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution.
The reason? In some Dem counties, officials alerted voters that their mail-in ballots needed fixing while that didn't happen in some GOP counties.
Lawyers for the Dems have countered:
It's not the fault of Dem counties that allowed voters to fix (or "cure") their ballots if GOP counties didn't do that.
They argue that the Trump campaign should have sued those counties but did not.