This is wrong, absolutely wrong. The literature in Critical Race Theory is not going to use proper, appropriate, or rigorous methods. CRT is not hit or miss, it's a bad method based on flawed assumptions. The problem is the *method* of CRT, it's rotten to the core....
https://twitter.com/bernybelvedere/status/1329177825832742918
And that is why this is bad. The Problem is not considering race in medical decisions, or observing how race might be a relevant variabls in public health, the problem is using Critical Race Theory to do the analysis. The underlying assumltions and method of CRT are wrong...
I don't dislike phrenology because I don't want to study psychology, I dislike phrenology because it's pseudo-intellectual nonsense.
I don't dislike CRT because I want to avoid studying how race relates to health, I dislike CRT because its pseudo-intellectual nonsense
I don't dislike CRT because I want to avoid studying how race relates to health, I dislike CRT because its pseudo-intellectual nonsense
The problem is not "academic fields uncritically adopting boutique progressivist buzzfare," the problem is the *methods* these field use are broken...like phrenology. We should stop using methods like CRT because those methods are not good for doing rigorous and proper analysis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
