Thread by @EOwhit

Lets do some SM back to Drops. Just looking at the time in between those tweets. Looking at MF TS. He has a new one, so we'll subtract that from the second recent. 11:34am is the new one. The second one is, 8:28am from yesterday.

I would like to focus on the underlined times in the snip (other options could be taken). On 27.1(0) seems viable, I looked at 2701 as well, just because. Then of course the 2706 just noted the day as 24hours, added it to the remaining time. Going from newest to oldest.

Drop 2710. I've already had a second to look at these. We'll take a note on the time stamp provided. It will be a bit more obvious why in a second. Not to mention how did we arrive to this spot? A method? Just subtraction of times. Note for 06:02:24 am.

Drop 2706 is next. This one has two images, again we can make a note of the time 5:31:17 am. More to it I'm sure. If you noted some of the method (just subtraction) you can probably guess what we are gonna do in a moment.

Drop 2701, unusual gap, between pictures? Interesting that this sequence should lead us to a +/-, isn't that a deviation? Lets go ahead and look at the time difference on the pictures.

So 6:02:24 am, minus, 5:31:17 am. So that ends up being 31 minutes and 07 seconds. Not that times stamps aren't important, look at that 1775 reference on the pic, last snip.

Another gander at MF's page. So 1777. Let's walk it down.
1777 is the newest and current. 1776. Now the last snip. 1775. It's the snip where we started? MF's 1775 tweet? Just another o7 +/- Qincidence. Shoutout to @Gregham47472271,

https://twitter.com/Gregham47472271/status/1329103776414744576?s=20

If any errors in transposition or math are incorrect. Please let me know!
@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.