Thread by @ezduzit63

Shelby vs Holder
Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), was a landmark decision[1] of the US Supreme Court regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and

local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and Section 4(b), which contains the coverage formula that determines which jurisdictions are subjected to preclearance

based on their histories of discrimination in voting.[
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_Co…

@realDonaldTrump @FLOTUS @SidneyPowell1 @RudyGiuliani

@JennaEllisEsq Clear Case of Discrimination and not just against Minorities but based on Voting Rights PERIOD

They have discriminated against every American and their right to Vote and destruction of the Constitutional Consent of the Governed

They used Funds from the HAVA Act to fund a lot of their misdeeds not to Aid Minority Voting

Discrimination against Voters Rights ....Violation of the Constitutional Right to the Consent of the Governed. They used HAVA Funds for the Voting Process in CA but not pertaining to Minority Voting? In PA they changed the Rules even though Act 77 inacted in 2019

Attempt to DEFRAUD?
rumble.com/vatzu1-joe-bid…