Just as in the Arnab Goswami case where there were multiple FIRs to harass people, the Supreme Court today also came to the rescue of "personal liberty."
Oh wait, no, it didn't. The Supreme Court said instead, "show me the man, I'll show you the law."
(PS. People will say that trial courts' hands are tied because of SC's UAPA judgments (such as Watali). That is false. Every judgment can be distinguished.)
India's Police Courts once again demonstrating how even "one day deprived of personal liberty is one day too many."
With Hugo Noms open, will try to highlight, over the next few days, some of the work I read in 2020, with the caveat that I'm sure there is a lot of amazing work I couldn't read.
By fellow-Indians: @lavanya_ln's Analogue/Virtual for best novel:
Back to the novel category, I would commend for your consideration @EssaHansen's Nophek Gloss, Seth Dickinson's The Tyrant Baru Cormorant, and @aptshadow's The Children of Time.
The Court act as if it can "suspend" laws of its own sweet will. It can't.
For the Court to stay a law, it has to find that it is prima facie unconstitutional, and issue a reasoned order saying so. This is *not* optional.
For obvious reasons, it has not done so here.
It is cynical for another reason. A host of laws have been challenged before the Supreme Court in recent times, where arguments were *actually* made for prima facie unconstitutionality. The Court refused to stay any of these laws, and refused to even engage with the arguments.
Let's be very clear that what Salve wants to do here is to effectively kill the right to protest by firing from the court's shoulder. It's the easiest thing for State agents to infiltrate a peaceful protest, cause violence, and then leave the "organiser" to bear the brunt.
In fact that's what the UP government has been up to with its ordinances. Make sure nobody ever calls a (peaceful) protest, because even if somebody totally random causes violence, the state can swoop down, confiscate your property, and put you in jail.
As the name suggests, the book is about the Tebhaga Movement (1946 - 1948), which was a peasant-led movement in Bengal, demanding 2/3 of the harvest for the tiller.
It eventually turned into an armed insurrection and was put down with force. (2/n)
Punjabi's focus is on the (prominent) role of women in the movement, which she reconstructs through oral interviews and testimonies, taken many years after it was over.
Finished reading @aptshadow's The Doors of Eden. Whew. It's a really good book, and you should read it. A brief thread with some of my favourite passages (no spoilers):
(1/n)
"But this is still made landscape. We can never return it to what it was. The land is never still, and what we've made here cannot change and grow like a land should. It is a garden, but a garden is better than a wasteland."
(2/n)
"He was not good. He was good. He was not bad.
There are shades of qualities that your language does not accommodate. Between us there was not love or love but love. Love is pain sometimes. Sometimes pain is good ... complicated things."