So, let's recap. The lead actor of Sia's movie isn't autistic, and in preparation for her role, she watched Youtube videos of autistic children's meltdowns (undoubtedly filmed by their parents.) When called out, Sia replies to an autistic actor, 'maybe you're just a bad actor.'
Sia claims to have spent three years researching this movie. And yet she somehow missed that Autism Speaks is a hate group? How shallow was your research?
Apparently, Sia tried to cast an autistic person, but it didn't work. I'd be willing to bet that the autistic person found filming a stressful experience because sufficient accommodations weren't made on set, but that's just my hunch.
Sia writes that it felt 'more compassionate' to cast Maddie, a neurotypical person who watched videos of autistic children having meltdowns on Youtube as her research for the role.
Finally, Sia concluded that an autistic actor would be unable to play the role, due to one autistic person's experience. Evidently, in Sia's head autism is a monolith.
In a vast majority of her replies to criticism, Sia implores people to see the film before judging it. But the thing is, I don't need to see this film, as I've already seen it dozens and dozens of times.
Autistic people have seen NTs mimic us on screen for decades, and this film will be no different. This film will do nothing but harm the very people it claims to represent.
Anyway, you couldn't create a larger trash fire if you tried, and Sia's (many) garbage replies to considered criticism from the autistic community is deeply telling.
In many of her tweets, Sia implores us to see the film based on her 'intentions.' Okay, so you want autistic people, the very community you're claiming and failing to represent, to hurl money at your neurotypical film based on your good intentions? NOPE.
The whole saga is deeply disappointing, upsetting and infuriating. Instead of using her enormous platform to create what could have been a pioneering film in terms of autistic representation, @Sia has just created a film that's more of the same. What a damn shame.
#ActuallyAutistic is currently trending in response to Sia, as is Autism Speaks. To my fellow disabled people who are talking about this absolute train wreck, keep on saying why the film (and Sia's tweets) are unacceptable. Look after your spoons. I stand with y'all. ❤️✊🏼
Also, @Twitter, the term 'autistic people' would be preferable here
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the things that annoys me about poetry award season is that so many poets were allowed to develop and flourish thanks to Arvon courses, the Complete Works, the Ledbury Critics and so on. But what's out there for disabled poets? Who helps them to develop?
If you're a young poet or an LGBT+ poet or a poet of colour, there are avenues (though nowhere near enough) to help you hone your craft. Who's helping disabled poets thrive? What infrastructure is there to guide the disabled poets of the future?
If I was teaching one day and a young disabled poet asked me how they could develop their work, I wouldn't have a damn clue where to direct them. Not just UK poetry, but world poetry fails not only young disabled poets but disabled poets period, over and over again.
Today's Dodge Poetry Festival schedule has included readings from Lambda Literary, Kundiman, as well as panels on climate justice and poetry, and the many poetries that exist in America. It's so nice to be able to catch up on the events I miss the following day, too. #DPF2020
Due to the time difference, a lot of the evening events happen from midnight onwards, so it's wonderful to be able to catch up on what I missed the following day. I've been waking up and sipping my morning coffee while watching the previous evening's events
Edward Hirsch read a poem by Adrienne Rich which I had forgotten, called 'Dedications.' It has lines like this, 'I know you are reading this poem/in a room where too much has happened for you to bear.' #DPF2020