Thread by @stillgray

Imagine opposing mass immigration and terrorism and poverty but also opposing mass population control programs of troubled counties. Can’t relate.

Droning brown people’s weddings in the Middle East is clearly the superior option according to some people.

I’m not saying I prefer one thing over the other but I would like to point out the logical inconsistencies between opposing something based on “human rights” but throwing out those human rights entirely when drones and bombs get involved as a solution.

There’s a certain hypocrisy in opposing peaceful initiatives because it seems patriarchal and colonialistic but being okay with dropping bombs on innocent people to arrive at the same result.

You’re not taking away anyone’s rights with vaccines. Vaccines prolong children’s lives that would’ve otherwise be cut short and this in turn causes people in developing countries to have fewer kids, which they get as an insurance policy to look after them in their old age.