Many apps have inbox management tools, like [snooze, leave unread, reply, archive] in email, or [schedule, sort, complete] in task managers. What "newsfeed management" tools could be given to users to enable them to make a never-ending stream of information personally valuable?
For people interested in applying BeSci to product design, this falls into a class of questions about Choice Architecture.
One question you could use to answer this: what are the user’s possible options in response to each card of information to train the algorithm favorably?
I’m loosely defining inbox management as how you handle a finite list of items to be process, and newsfeed management as how you handle an infinite list of items that can never be fully processed. I’ll expand on my thoughts on newsfeed management here but I want to hear yours too
I think LinkedIn is actually the best at this right now of major social media sites if you know to use it. Here Carson liked a post by a page. I can elect to unfollow either entirely, or just see less posts like it (and therefore, less from Carson or Love What Matters).
Obviously, you can like or comment on a post to signal to the algorithm that you want to see more like it. However, those send a social signal to the other person. Saving content privately should also be a strong indicator that I like that content.
Twitter allows users to mute keywords. This is incredibly helpful for newsfeed management! I’ve even been able to turn off retweets that aren’t QTs (h/t @jhooks)
Unfortunately, in response to most tweet, I can’t say “see less like this” through any of my choices. It’s either mute, block, or unfollow. Those are far too strong for me and aren’t reflective of my actual preference to simply see less of it.
One problem with newsfeed management, even when options are good, is that they are hidden. Positive reinforcement (likes/comments) are choices you have at first glance. Negative reinforcement is hidden behind those three dots. I want to simply tell the algo what I want less of.
The problem isn’t just that people don’t have adequate options to manage their newsfeeds. Even when available, they often aren’t used.
What if the choice was made explicit with each info card in the stream? Would this prompt people to be more intentional about newsfeed mgmt?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I tweet a lot because I’ve already tweeted a lot and have to thread my thoughts together. If all of the things I’ve tweeted were in Roam I could just thread things there and I’d probably be a lurker here. Also I like attention.
Honestly though has anyone made a single player Twitter client? Tweet and search only, no news feed or notifications? I feel a bit of a compulsion to add onto threads sometimes but I get sucked into exploratory browsing.
Anyone else catch themselves opening Twitter, checking notifications to see if there’s anything to deal with, and then OPENING THE NEWSFEED? That’s a dangerous string of behaviors if you’re cutting down distractions. Two gateway behaviors! I just wanna write thoughts & thread
Yesterday I was given a demo of @codexeditor. Absolutely wacky, in all of the right ways. Everything is an entity on a graph that can have labeled relationships with other entities. The UX is basically creating a new desktop OS in your browser for managing all info on that graph.
When I say everything can be an entity, I mean it... text, images, video, audio, websites. Iian is leaning into workspace model, allowing saved arrangements of what you have on the screen to revisit later. Those are also graph entities you can link to.
Whether it will see broad success or not, I have no idea. It's the sort of thing where you can only wrap your head around it so much without using it. It's insanely ambitious in doing a million things, so we'll see what people will actually do with it
Reading @DellAnnaLuca’s excellent book “Ergodicity” in its Roam form right now. The book’s content is excellent, but that’s not the focus of this thread. Since it’s pioneering the Roam book form, I wanted to give some thought on how the transition from paper to Roam is handled.
First I’ll point out the positives. It is really cool having the full text accessible in my own database. Annotating directly within Roam allows me access to my full knowledge base, and being able to reorganize its structure as I see fit is a treat.
I love that he made certain Roam/css improvements to augment the reading experience. For example, the styling to allow for footnotes was an excellent choice. Also, having pages built for quick definition lookups is great.
For anyone looking to distract themselves right now, I ported about half of @Thinkwert's "Principus" choose-your-own-adventure story into GuidedTrack, a product where I'm working on the onboarding. Will you become the next emperor of Rome? guidedtrack.com/programs/kqgtv…
I only wrote out ~half of the original megathread, up until the point where you succeed at becoming the emperor. There were about 40 outcomes after that, so I decided to wrap up there. You can find the initial megathread here:
I have no idea how long it must have taken him to write this initially with quote tweets to many tiny linked threads. With GuidedTrack it basically felt like I was just typing the thing out, there weren't extra implementation steps coming from a GUI that isn't made for this.
What impact do you believe competition generally has on a person's performance? When people feel competitive social forces, do they step up their game or do they crack under the pressure?
In a meta-analysis of 474 studies on the relationship b/w competition and performance, @KouMurayama & Elliot found an overall effect size of .03 of competition on performance. So basically no effect on performance. But there's more to the story here... psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-28…
Intuitively, most of us would feel that competition has some impact on performance. Maybe it works better for some people than others, or there are some characteristics of the competitive situation that lead people to be effective or ineffective?
Fantastic article from @hpadkisson about how to use @RoamResearch for qualitative research! An excellent capstone from @nateliason's Effortless Output course. My process has slight differences, but is mostly similar! 🧵👇assumes you read the article ️uxdesign.cc/roam-research-…
One alt approach to her way of capturing data during user interviews uses block references for the questions, and capture each interview on an individual level in daily notes. You can filter the block references for each question in the same way you can filter page references:
Imagine in the above screenshot I made it so instead of saying P01 it said template. Then I could block reference that, apply children as text, and I have the whole user interview script below. Easy templating with block references, see QT