"Covid UK: Facts about the risks, the death rate, and NHS capacity"
Utterly deplorable article from the Daily Mail, which ignores the fact that the casualty projections assumed no action taken, but of course action WAS taken (because of the projections). dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
Utterly deplorable article from the Daily Mail, which ignores the fact that the casualty projections assumed no action taken, but of course action WAS taken (because of the projections). dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8…
It's like someone saying: "If you don't brake at the end of the street before taking the corner, you'll wrap your car around a tree. I have seen many do it."
You brake, and avoid the tree.
You then mock the original advice for having "scaremongered" a collision with the tree.
You brake, and avoid the tree.
You then mock the original advice for having "scaremongered" a collision with the tree.
In fact, epidemic projections are cited as an example of self-defeating prophecies on Wikipedia.
It's impossible that the original journalist doesn't understand this. This is propaganda, either at the government's behest or to promote the covidiot agenda.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defe…
It's impossible that the original journalist doesn't understand this. This is propaganda, either at the government's behest or to promote the covidiot agenda.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defe…
But when you take a step back, and a second look, you realise that articles like this are even more corrosive!
They "keep score" by measuring the UK's progress against a hypothetical apocalypse, whereas they should do so against a zero deaths baseline. 50,000+ dead is 😱 not 👏.
They "keep score" by measuring the UK's progress against a hypothetical apocalypse, whereas they should do so against a zero deaths baseline. 50,000+ dead is 😱 not 👏.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
