Lisa Monaco would be an excellent choice for attorney geberal. Unlike Yates, she has not been on a lot of people's lists in rumoring about the role. It's good that she *is* apparently on Biden's list. She is diversely qualified. She is also a very serious person.
The reason, speaking candidly, that she has not been on my list is that I have assumed the incumbent president was going to fire Chris Wray and that Lisa would be a leading candidate for FBI Director. She would be excellent in either role.
Incidentally, the FBI Director role is a much harder one to fill than the attorney general. There are many fewer people qualified to do that job. Lisa is VERY well qualified that role. So if Biden expects Wray to be removed or expects to remove him, he might plausibly...
...save Lisa for that role.
I don't know how to game out that possibility because Trump could fire Wray tomorrow or not at all--and I don't know Biden's plans vis a vis Wray either.

But my bottom line is this: Lisa would be a first-rate candidate in either role.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Benjamin Wittes

Benjamin Wittes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @benjaminwittes

22 Nov
Bolero is a neato warhorse, but it is actually one of Ravel's less impressive works. I remember at Oberlin wandering into @CarlaKihlstedt's practice room when she was practicing the "blues" movement from his sonata for violin and piano. It blew my mind. I've loved Ravel since.
Here's @JoshuaBellMusic playing it with @jeremydenk, who was also at Oberlin with us:
The rest of the sonata is baller too.
Read 4 tweets
21 Nov
Does anyone seriously believe that senators would be lining up to preemptively oppose @AmbassadorRice if she looked a little more like, say, Tom Donilon?
She is overwhelmingly qualified. The reasons for opposition to her--at least as I understand them--are nonsense.
So to all senators who are lining up to denounce her, I issue a challenge: articulate clearly why you think she is not an appropriate nominee. I'm open to persuasion here. Really. But if you're going to declare an overwhelmingly well-qualified black woman as DOA as a nominee...
...you should able to make a clear case based on disqualifying facts, positions, or views.

So what is it?
Read 7 tweets
20 Nov
To everyone flipping out on Twitter right now. Stop. Breath. And let’s go over what’s going to happen. Tomorrow, the electoral result in Georgia will be certified. Monday, the results in Michigan and Pennsylvania will be certified.
Arizona will follow in a week.
Nevada and Wisconsin will certify on December 1.

The electors will cast their votes on December 14.

Congress will count those votes on January 6.

That is what’s going to happen.

All the rest is antidemocratic noise.
The reason you are hearing nothing but calm seriousness from the president-elect and his team is that they know this.
Read 9 tweets
18 Nov
A challenge to those inclined to dismiss this statement as rhetorical hyperbole: Show me the evidence-free challenge that Republicans are making to any sizable contingent of white votes in any of the states at issue.
I know of none. Maybe @KristenClarkeJD or @marceelias or @emilybazelon can help me out here. Or maybe some of the Trumpists can point me to an example.
But remember: 40 percent of white people voted for Biden. If you want a huge pool of votes to delegitimization, you should be interested in counting only the legal ballots among those votes. Why are Republicans not fishing in those waters?
Read 4 tweets
14 Nov
I learned only yesterday on @inlieuoffunshow that the @nytimes once ran an oped by Hitler: nytimes.com/1941/06/22/arc…

Who knew?
To be precise. It's excerpts from Mein Kampf. Not clear to me why they published it at this stage--more than a decade after its publication.
There does not appear to be an editor's note explaining the editorial purpose. Given the time of publication, June 1941--during a prior of US formal neutrality but backing of UK--I assume it must have been to show how horrible he was. But I am not sure. Does anyone know?
Read 4 tweets
13 Nov
An Announcement: we are proud to welcome @AVindman to the @lawfareblog team as the Lawfare Institute’s Pritzker Military Fellow.

lawfareblog.com/alexander-vind…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!