PA Judge Brann is not having it, writing the Trump campaign lawyers "ask this Court to disenfranchise
almost seven million voters.... One might expect that when
seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and...
almost seven million voters.... One might expect that when
seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and...
2/ "...factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this
Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened...
Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened...
3/ "Instead, this Court has been presented with strained
legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence..."
electionlawblog.org/wp-content/upl…
legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence..."
electionlawblog.org/wp-content/upl…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
