This gives me an excuse to return to one of my favourite topics - Poland in the Napoleonic period. 😉
This prayer for the “conversion” or “return to the Faith” of Polish economists and scientists and for exorcising the evil spirit of cosmopolitanism from Polish universities
appeared on the site of Radio Maryja (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Mar… ) founded and run by a Redemptorist monk, Tadeusz Rydzyk (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tadeusz_R… ). Father Rydzyk has been for years in an uneasy alliance with Poland’s currently governing Law and Justice Party. In fact, it was not
even always an alliance - nobody has quite forgotten that many years ago, Jarosław Kaczyński described Father Rydzyk’s project as a Russian intelligence operation. Kaczyński referred to generally anti-Western outlook of the station and the fact that it was easily able to obtain
a powerful transmitter in the Ural Mountains. It was in 1998, a year before Yeltsin chose Putin as Prime Minister. Kaczyński said then “although there is a mess in Russia right now, certain things they pay careful attention to.” Kaczyński later apologised for these words.
There were of course words on the other side too. In 2007 the magazine Wprost published a secret recording of a talk by Rydzyk at the private university in Toruń, which he runs, in which he described the late President Lech Kaczyński (Jarosław’s brother) as a
"a swindler who had bowed to pressure from the Jewish lobby” and his wife Maria as “a witch who should perform euthanasia on herself”.
Rydzyk claimed that the tapes had been doctored.

Anyway, the Redemptorists are an order formed in Italy specifically to work with the poor and
they have always been probably the mist militantly conservative grouping in the Polish Church. And in 1808 they were for that reason expelled from the Duchy of Warsaw by Napoleon’s Marshal Davout.
Napoleon created the Duchy in 1897, after his victories over Prussia and Russia,
out of territories taken by Prussia from the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in the Partitions. This was done as part of the treaty of Tilsit, and in order not to upset the Tsar and Austria, which was neutral at that time, the name Poland was not used, and the new state,
was called a Duchy and not a Kingdom. Napoleon, unusually for himself, for he hardly cared for “legitimism”, on thus occasion decided to follow Poland’s short lived Constitution of the 3rd of May 1791, which declared the Saxon Wettin dynasty hereditary rulers of Poland. Since
Elector of Saxony (later King) Friedrich August was his ally, it was an easy decision for Napoleon to make him the Duke of the new Duchy. But Napoleon’s mist immediate concern was the raise as many troops from the Duchy as possible and for this purpose its administration had to
be put on a sound basis. Napoleon gave this task to his best commander and administrator, Marshal Louis Nicholas Davout, who was also awarded the Duchy of Lowicz as a personal fief.
While Davout was in overall charge, Prince Poniatowski was made the commander of the new Polish
army. Davout at first distrusted Poniatowski, whom he viewd as a decadent aristocrat (he himself was of noble origin but joined the Revolution while many of his relatives remained monarchists) but later changed his mind and the two became close allies and even friends, which was
very special because the strict and severe Davout had very few of those. Anyway, Davout’s task was to implement the code of Napoleon, which, among other things, legitimized diverse. Davout himself, was actually a believing Catholic, but of a very moderate kind and the
Redemptorists soon proved to be an obstacle, which the Marshal dealt with in his typical way
Davout, by the way, was considered very pro-Polish and in Napoleon’s circle, the strongest supporter of creating a genuinely independent Polish state. Since he had many enemies, they made sure that this was presented as due to personal ambition. Connected with this was also the
fact that Davout was the staunchest supporter of war against Russia of 1812, its principal organizer and was therefore blamed when it turned out disastrously, although it has to be remembered that Napoleon disregarded the Marshal’s advice when making several key decisions.
As a result the relationship between Napoleon and his best marshal (not only was Davout never defeated himself, but Napoleon never lost a battle in which Davout was involved - he was absent at both Leipzig and Waterloo) broke down, although Davout remained loyal to the very end.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

22 Nov
He was unluckily in his ambitious foreign policy , which was betrayed and ruined by his two terrible successors.
His domestic policy was a mixed bad. He was not responsible for the loose monetary policy and the the housing bubble
which began in the days of the Clinton administration and actually enjoyed bipartisan support in Congress, nor for the massive misuse of mathematical methods borrowed from finance for valuing mortgage backed securities etc, which lay at the heart of the financial crisis of 2008.
However, he did allow the deficit to grow excessively, which made the crisis worse. Many of the problems in foreign policy were inherited from the previous administrations: it was the Clinton administration that refused to provide any aid to Ahmad Shah Massoud, ignited Pakistan’s
Read 24 tweets
18 Nov
@moutet @RichardKeppler1 How Putin came to power, why, and why the military (general Lebed, general Rokhlin) failed, is a fascinating and still not entirely clear story (Andrei Illarionov, who is better qualified than any one else to do so, had a fascinating series of blog posts on this subject). If I
@moutet @RichardKeppler1 were to write what I think about it, it would make a thickish book. I was discussing this over 20 years ago with some people who are considered among top world experts and I will make the immodest claim that I was more right than they (one of those who were right from the start
@moutet @RichardKeppler1 was Andrei Piontkovsky, who, by the way, was once also a mathematician before turning to political analysis. Anyway, Greene was basically wrong, he never really understood what the KGB was. Yes, it was elite, but GRU thought itself even more elite (as you would know from
Read 5 tweets
17 Nov
This is mostly true but:
1. Putin is surrounded by many Russified ethnic Armenians (including Lavrov and RT’s head Simoyan ) who actually do back Armenian claims but only as part of wider Russian imperial outreach. Their aim was to discredit Pashinyan and the American
Armenian diaspora and turn Armenian into a Russian outpost. They view Armenian nationalist ambitions as a tool that can still be used in the future.
2. The Armenian cause was strongly supported by Russian nationalist groups linked to the militants fighting in the Donbas and in
Syria. Quite a few have Armenians fought with them and expected the same thing in return. Therea are strong emotional between the two as can be seen on the Russian Telegram site WarGonzo (which carries reports on the fighting in Syria, Donbas, Libya and NK) and the Russian
Read 6 tweets
16 Nov
Here is a fragment, which I just translated, from a book by the Polish historian Paweł Jasienica entitled “Thoughts about civil war”.
It was written in communist Poland and only published in 1993, after the author’s death and the fall of communism.
On the 17th of October took place the battle of Cholet, which, although at first successful for the rebels, ended in their defeat. Their fanaticism could not match the military skills of regular soldiers Marceau and Kléber.
In a critical moment in front of the division of the latter there appeared, running away in a panic, a political commissar and member of the National Convention, Jean-Baptiste Carrier

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Bapt…
Read 14 tweets
16 Nov
This morning before starting my Zoom lecture I told my wife the reasons why I don’t believe Trump’s claims that the election was falsified and she found them convincing, so I thought about repeating my arguments here. By the way, many Japanese are seriously worried that Biden
may abandon Trump’s “tough” attitude to China and abandon Japan alone, which makes them more inclined to take the allegations of fraud seriously, especially if some Chinese involvement is suggested.
Anyway, my argument against the fraud theory is primarily based on, wait for it,
opinion polls. Of course I am not saying that the were right, in fact, as almost everybody acknowledges , they were spectacularly wrong. But I am pretty sure that that the great majority of Trump opponents and, in particular, Democrats believed in them. And that is one reason
Read 15 tweets
9 Nov
Here is a story that should be known better than it is, about how a very brave judge invalidated a fraudulent election, in spite of great pressure and personal risk. And it happened, of all places, in wartime Japan.
Many people will be surprised that an election of any kind could actually take place in what they assume was a "fascist state", let alone that a judge could invalidate it, (or more correctly, a part of it, in one prefecture). But in fact such an election did take place in
April of 1942, , while the Pacific War was in full swing. Moreover it was not entirely unfree even by present day standards.

Political parties were dissolved in 1940, but their members continued to sit in the Diet where they enjoyed Parliamentary immunity.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!