One of the culture war’s more absurd mantras is the threat of evangelical leaders capitulating to worldly demands for justice out of an appetite for popular esteem.
In fact the opposite is true: those who give any thought to popular opinion relish every opportunity to shock unbelievers with their abrasive rhetoric—thereby inviting backlash, which serves as a pretext for claims of persecution.
Under guise of combating “wokeness”—a vacuous notion contrived to provoke illiterate fear—men with evangelical platforms make unlearned and outrageous pronouncements on subjects ranging from political economy to public health.
Meanwhile, earnest pastors and seminary faculty find their employment threatened if they express godly, biblical, theologically orthodox concerns about manifest injustices in our present social order.
So as far as it concerns politics, the most salient threat to principled Christian leadership lies within evangelical culture itself.
...under *the* guise...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
If @MBTS is determined to give Owen a platform for his pronouncements on institutional ethics, its administration might consider granting him a teaching reduction that would afford him leisure to familiarize himself with the basic contours of the subject.
A myth says what is false in order to reveal truth.
A lie says what is false in order to obscure truth.
The myth at the core of our nation is that America provides liberty and justice for all in equal measure.
The truth underlying the myth is that equality before the law is a worthy aspiration.
We lie to ourselves when we act as though this myth reflects the reality of our present existence: we obscure the truth when we tell ourselves that the aspiration has been realized, or realized enough.
The reason that our nation is disintegrating before our eyes is that we, as a society, lack a shared conception of justice--a common understanding of what people deserve and what we owe to each other.
So although Americans share a patch of earth, we do not share a horizon: we've degenerated into a collection of special interest groups--our highest political aspiration is to secure benefits for ourselves and those like us.
Both books are excellent and I commend them to anyone interested in the interplay of politics and religion in the context of American evangelicalism.
Regarding any formal connection between Mohler's official role at Southern Seminary (or within the SBC broadly) and his enthusiasm for broadcasting personal political views that are unrelated to his expertise in theology:
It is beyond ludicrous for a prince of the SBC's Conservative Resurgence to express concern over censorship among Catholics. Conservative Catholics can say just about anything they please, without fear of any reprisal whatsoever.
Censorship is the calling card of conservative Protestants who insist on ideological conformity.
Now it would be one thing if this insistence on conformity were strictly or even primarily theological.
But the worst-kept secret of the Conservative Resurgence is that the reforms of the '80s and '90s were motivated as much by devotion to cultural and political conservatism as a commitment to God's Word.
As a conservative Protestant who has spent much of his professional life at Catholic institutions, I can say that this statement from Mohler shows especially poor judgment on his part.
Pope Francis’s full statement—consistent with his other statements on the subject—is supportive of civil unions *instead of* same-sex marriage, where the relevant alternatives include ‘marriage’ and ‘civil union’.
Here’s a detailed treatment of Francis’s statement in context: