Probably, 20% of the tweets you read deliver 80% of the value of using Twitter.
You'd be a fool not to prioritize your feed.
Here's how I do it.
(thread, 1/5)
2/ First of all, I set up a Twitter List of the 20 accounts from which I get the most value, and I pin it to my Twitter app.
This is my default feed. Because there are few accounts, I can find the time to read all their tweets even on busy days.
For the rest…
3/ For the rest, I use an app called Mailbrew
I created a digest w/ "news" that gets delivered every morning in my inbox. Because it only shows the top 3 tweets by account, it ensures I only read the best
4/ Then, I set up a second digest with the next 20-40 accounts, timed to be delivered when I take my coffee break). On quiet days, I read it. On busy ones, I archive the mail.
The idea is that I prioritize the "info sources" to ensure the highest average quality for my info diet
5/ Before using that, I achieved the same result in the Twitter app by using 3 lists, one high-priority, one medium, and one low – and reading them in order, if I have time.
Mailbrew has the advantage that each list is in one email. It avoids mindless browsing in the Twitter app
6/ Moreover, you can set the frequency to every other day or to limit the number of tweets per account per edition to the top 3 by likes and retweets.
It's not perfect, but it's much better than relying on Twitter's algorithm.
7/ In conclusion, I strongly suggest that you either use Twitter lists, or Mailbrew (mailbrew.com/?aff=DellAnnaL…), or some other form of prioritization.
Not exclusively, but your time is limited, and not prioritizing would be a waste.
8/ The same, by the way, applies to reading books.
If 20% of books deliver 80% of the value, and re-reading a book gives you even just 10% additional value, say, then you're better off reading the top 20% a second time than reading a random similar amount of books from the rest.
9/ This daily digest is a perfect way to start (you can subscribe with your email and receive it in your inbox; I curate it personally):
2/ As a general principle, solving the symptom of a problem without solving the underlying causes is a terrible idea. It removes the urgency to solve the problem once and for all, making it grow larger.
3/ One question worth asking is, why is student debt not a problem in Europe?
The naive answer: government subsidies to students.
The real answer: contained costs.
The total operational costs for my ex-university in 2018 were "just" $7.8k / student / year.
3/ If we order the 21 parameters by descending predictive power, and apply it to the data used to build the model, we discover that:
- The first parameter alone predicts the outcome of many regions.
- The last parameter, at most, helps predicting the outcome of a single region.
THE FUTURE OF NEWSLETTERS
(and announcing my new newsletter 🎉)
Too much noise, too little content we actually use.
Take your favorite newsletter. Can you remember the contents of the edition-before-the-last-one?
Me neither. But I have a solution
(thread, 1/N)
2/ Today, I launch the RoamLetter.
A newsletter whose content directly integrates into your note-taking system.
A newsletter whose editions AUTOMATICALLY link with each other *and with your notes* 👏
A newsletter with built-in spaced repetition.
A timeless newsletter.
3/ If you are a Roam user, you'll enjoy how the topics of one edition of my newsletter automatically link with your body of knowledge, and the other way around.
If you are not a Roam user, no worries. You can still use all the other features of my newsletter (pics below)
MASKS WORK EVEN IF THE VIRUS IS SMALLER THAN THE HOLES IN THE FABRIC
As a first effect, the virus bounces on the fibers. That's enough to decrease the distance at which it "jumps out". It might even get some of the particles to stuck to the fibers.
(thread, 1/N)
2/ Second, N95 masks also have electrostatic charges that capture particles even if they are smaller than the holes in the fabric.
3/ Third, masks would work even if the virus passed fully through.
They reduce the distance at which it travels after, say, a sneeze. It's as if they introduced additional distance between people.
Moreover, they work both on the way out and on the way in.
6 million Italians should be in home quarantine, only a fraction of them because they tested positive. Most of them are there because tests are few and slow.
Another part of the problem is that enforcing the quarantine & working through the tests backlog is cheaper, easier, and more effective when there are few cases than when there are a lot,
But one would also need the will, capability, and wisdom to do so when it seems less urgent