Remember that this is a QAnon supporter. He doesn't even hide it. Then assess his sanity. Set aside the past; the past is dust. He's into QAnon. That's all you need to know.
https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1330220682169475073
The most insulting thing to people who think independently and have working brains is the "but muh massive vote fraud" folks saying "Powell and Wood have TRACK RECORDS! You can't question their authority."
The hell I can't. I know up from down, and I know this field.
The hell I can't. I know up from down, and I know this field.
This is another common arg among QAnon/Powell/Wood supporters and it's risible b/c it always comes from people who have absolutely no idea how litigation works and think it's like Perry Mason or hack TV. You can't just offer "surprise" evidence in court!
https://twitter.com/AlFromBayShore/status/1330937052070895620
Entire pt of court proceeding is you must *reveal in advance* what your evidence is, witnesses, etc. so that the opposing party has a chance to plan a response. People like Wood and Powell who promise "secret revelations in court" know better; they're playing on lay ignorance.
Attempting to present new evidence to an appellate court after the original trier of fact has already ruled, especially evidence you intentionally withheld for "reasons": it's a bold strategy, Cotton, let's see how it works out.
https://twitter.com/SpikerIsAwesome/status/1330938896914509828
(for those who don't understand: appellate courts don't work like this. They don't revisit the factual findings of the lower court. Unless there is plain error--an amazingly high standard--they accept all the factual findings as 100% settled and deal solely with errors of law.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
