Share this page!

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
Twitter logo
25 Nov, 4 tweets, 3 min read
श्री राम राम रामेति रमे रामे मनोरमे ।
सहस्रनाम तत्तुल्यं रामनाम वरानने ॥
Even if our numbers are small there is Dharma in the demand for Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement and Lord Shri Rama will ensure victory of Dharma and ensure our protection.

Tomorrow 26th Nov Constitution day let us remember the efforts made by Kanchi Paramacharya to insert Art 26 which protects the pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's great Kingdom donation in Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity (embodiment of Dharma)
The pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's great Kingdom donation which secured protection of Dharma during 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic for Travancore Kingdom can secure same protection of Dharma from Covid pandemic. Let us work to reclaim lost pious purpose protected u Art 26.
Securing protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity embodiment of Dharma pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's great Kingdom donation the Spiritual Mask that can protect us from Covid key objective of Chilkur Balaji Art 26 #DeityRightsMovement

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Rangarajan chilkur

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @csranga

Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
26 Nov
As we celebrate Constitution day 26th Nov 1949 the day Constitution was adopted
Why Art 26 which protected Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity Right arising from pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's historic 1750 donation of Travancore Kingdom was part of basic structure ?
The statement made by Dewan of Travancore Kingdom to its legislature makes it very clear that protecting the rights of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity arising out of historic 1750 donation of Shri Marthanda Varma was a basic structure of Travancore Constitution. Image
As noted by the statement of Dewan the successors of Shri Marthanda Varma who ruled as Shri Padmanabha Dasa not only articulated but followed the ancient principle धर्मो रक्षति रक्षितः (protect Dharma to be protected by Dharma) by protecting the pious purpose of Kingdom donation.
Read 10 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
25 Nov
It is no wonder Shri @DrVSKarunakara1 Swamy descendant of Shri Nadadoor Ammal is passionate about Hindu Deity Rights & also sent supporting letter to His Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn.
How can we not fight for Lord Shri Rama's OM Vashat Karaya Namaha rights
To secure protection of Dharma After securing Lord Shri Rama temple at Ayodhya we now want to secure His constitutional rights that existed on 26th Jan 1950 as per Sardar Patel's promise in Art 26 but taken away by SC Sabarimala judgement against principles of Dharma taught by👇
While crores of devotees worked for reclaiming His temple at Ayodhya there are only a handful of devotees working for reclaiming His Art 26 rights and we need His promised help to succeed in this equally important dharmik cause. OM Vashat Karaya Namaha 🙏
Read 4 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
24 Nov
Chilkur Balaji July 18th letter on SC conclusion that Hindu Deities have no constitutional rights quotes SC quotation.
"In adharma flowing from wrong decision in a Court of law, one fourth each is attributed to the person committing the adharma, witness, the judges and the ruler" ImageImage
In the land of Shri Padmanabha Swamy (embodiment of Dharma) the 👆 effect of violation of Dharma in a Court of law on the Society (burning of Madurai) is remembered every year as part of Goddess Kannagi popularly known as Women Sabarimala temple festival.
atlasobscura.com/articles/india…
The dissent by a lady Judge and the uprising of crores of women devotees belonging to land of Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity read with Sage Apasthambha's view that Women are custodians of Dharma sheds a new light to Sabarimala uprising a warning to correct adharmik view of SC Image
Read 11 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
23 Nov
We secure eligibility seek same protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity (embodiment of Dharma) from Covid arising out of great Kingdom donation of Marthanda Varma which protected frm Spanish Flu of 1918 provided we correct violation of Dharma
thehindu.com/news/national/…
The above observation of SC in Sabarimala judgement Deity does not have constitutional rights by SC is in violation of Art 363 Dharma (Constitutional Morality) as Art 26 Ruler Deity rights are arising from the same act of donation of Kingdom of Marthanda Varma for below reasons.
SC Nine Judge bench by rejecting Deity petition and also not including issue of Constitutional rights of Hindu Deities in the questions framed arising out of Sabarimala judgement has foreclosed any judicial remedy to correct adharmic Sabarimala conclusion.
Read 11 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
22 Nov
Pious purpose of great Shri Marthanda Varma's Travancore Kingdom donation to Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity secured Lord Shri Krishna's Bhagavad Gita promised protection which ensured protection from 1918 Spanish Flu when rest of the world succumbed to the deadly virus.
Travancore Kingdom could access the protection arising from the pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's great act of donation in 1918 because its Constitution protected the pious purpose of donation in legal personality of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity as noted by Dewan.
Even after merger of Travancore Kingdom to form Bharath the pious purpose of Shri Marthanda Varma's Kingdom donation continued to be protected in legal personality of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity u Art 26 in our Constitution till it was disturbed by Sabarimala judgement
Read 5 tweets
Rangarajan chilkur Profile picture
21 Nov
Subject: - Advice to Ministry of Home Affairs to Expedite recognition of Art 26 Right to Protect of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity

We humbly request Your Excellency @rashtrapatibhvn to do the needful as per Dharma

OM VASHAT KARAYA NAMAHA 🙏

To secure protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity (embodiment of Dharma) we need to follow Dharma by reversing wrong conclusion in Sabarimala judgement that Hindu Deities have no constitutional rights the dharmik message of July 18th letter.

Followers of Hindu Religious denomination have fundamental right u Art 26 to secure protection of Lord Shri Padmanabha Swamy Ruler Deity from Covid as was secured during 1918 Spanish Flu successfully.
If Judiciary has created an obstacle 👆 the Executive is duty bound to remove.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get email notifications when new thread is out from this Author!

Check out other threads from this Author!

Read all threads by @csranga