4522 runs as an opening batsman at 61.10. Ahead of the rest of the field across the history of Test cricket by more than five runs per innings.
Len Hutton followed them a decade later. Together the triumvirate of Hobbs, Sutcliffe and Hutton stand head and shoulders above any other opening batsman … ever.
Yet, Sutcliffe is seldom spoken of when great, and often not so great, opening batsmen are recalled. Precious little is documented in terms of eulogies to his craft of batting.
He was not a pretty batsman; just one of the greatest of them all … who ended with better returns than Jack Hobbs, Wally Hammond, Frank Woolley and the rest of them.
No wonder Neville Cardus, that doyen of cricket writers, wrote sparingly about Sutcliffe while weaving his intricate tapestry of metaphors around his celebrated opening partner Hobbs.
Cardus wrote about Hobbs batting — at the wicket, at the nets, in the prime of his life and as an aged master. But when he wrote about the great man’s illustrious partner, it was mostly as an afterthought.
Cardus of course did not like Sutcliffe’s penchant for Saville Row suits and expensive hats. That, to this eternal snob, was a professional cricketer reaching above his station.
Often cavalier approach towards facts can be taken as beautiful writing with no intended harm, but it partial telling, untruths, higher truths, and all that result in a wrong picture and spoiling true legacy.
True history is in records, scorebooks, ledgers ... not reports
That is one of the reasons why we see two types of all-time England XIs today. One who hurriedly jot down Boycott and Cook as openers recognisable from TV screens. The others who delve through pool of cricket-memories and choose Hobbs and Hutton.
Sutcliffe is almost always ignored. In spite of averaging more than 5 per innings than any other opener in the history of the game. (Min Qual 2000 runs)
Sutcliffe’s approach to the game can be summed up with this characterising anecdote. When congratulated for saving England with yet another stubborn rearguard innings, Sutcliffe once responded, “I love a dog-fight.”
A self-made batsman who towered over most of the celebrated princes of the game. Herbert Sutcliffe was born on 24 Nov 1894.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread:
Cricket loving PM Robert Menzies kept a photograph of a perfect Miller square drive on his office desk. Ian Wooldridge called Miller “the golden boy” of cricket, leading to the nickname “Nugget”. Cardus referred to him as Australian in excelsis.
Miller ended with 2958 runs at 36.97 and 170 wickets at 22.97 from 55 Tests. The figures put him at the top of the list of all-rounders when he retired, and has been matched by only the likes of Garry Sobers, Imran Khan and Jacques Kallis since then.
With Ray Lindwall, he formed one of the scariest new ball partnerships. And he is one of the very few in history to bat high in the order while also bowling with the new ball.
West Indian captain John Goddard exclaimed, “Give us Keith Miller and we’ll beat the world.”
There was that eternal child in him. The innocent delight that sparked every time he touched a ball.
Without that child the Hand of God goal would've been impossible. And the second goal of the match, the run from his own half-line, perhaps the best goal of all time #RIPMaradona
That child lived in him notwithstanding the truckloads of cocaine, the links with the mafia, the sex workers in his room, the fake penis to dodge drug tests, the hideously bloated self after years of substance abuse #RIPMaradona
When as manager of Argentina he stood beyond the sidelines, desperately trying to fit in his charcoal-black suit … and when in that avatar he trapped the errant match ball effortlessly with his formal shoe … that eternal child sparked again. #RIPMaradona