Also, as someone who is doing online instruction for grad students, it absolutely is a form of learning. It’s imperfect and suboptimal compared to in-person instruction, but it’s still teaching. Jeff’s point about online learning has more validity for younglings.
The frustrating thing for everyone involved is that online anything is, on the whole, just less efficient. Which means folks like my wife and I are working harder and nonetheless providing a less-than-ideal service. Still, contra Jeff, it’s better than nothing.
See below the source for Jeff’s frustration, which I get. Anything remote is much less effective with young children. Just know that it’s equally personal and frustrating for service providers.
I’m glad you asked Erick, because this attempt —which you and other conservatives have made — to make a false equivalence between 2016 and 2020 is worth examining in more detail. 1/
Let’s focus on the most obvious difference: Hillary Clinton conceded the 2016 race within hours or the networks calling it. We are now approaching two weeks between a similar network call and Trump refusing to concede. 2/
Furthermore, by and large Democrats did not sabotage the transition period. Obama’s GSA ascertained the result for Trump almost immediately. Democrats in Congress did not en masse urge Clinton to litigate the outcome. FFS, Clinton attended the inauguration. 3/
This was a decade ago, at the end of an all-day U.S. foreign policy conference at Dartmouth. A few of us headed over to the Hanover Inn for a beer. Some colleagues asked me what else I was working on. I started telling them about the written-but-not-published zombie book... (2/8)
At that particular moment, Theories of International Politics and Zombies had passed peer review at @PrincetonUPress but still needed approval from the board. Ordinarily, that’s pro forma, but for the zombie book I was a touch nervous about its... unorthodox nature. (3/8)