Oligarchic Imperialism Is The New Dominant World Religion
"It is what shapes our culture. It is what holy wars are fought over and acts of terrorism committed for. It's what power is built around. It's what you're branded a heretic for rejecting." caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/oligarchic-i…
I was just watching a gaggle of blue-checkmarked narrative managers attack progressive commentators @kthalps and @briebriejoy for platforming antiwar journalist @RaniaKhalek on the grounds that Khalek is an "Assadist", which is imperialist for "heretic".
At no point do any of these narrative managers bother to address the actual things these women were discussing together or why anything Khalek was saying in their video conference was wrong.
There are many such labels that are used to exclude people from positions of influence and power for simply disagreeing with the official doctrine of status quo oligarchic imperialism in any way.
In reality, these labels are interchangeable with the word "heretic". They mean "Someone who disagrees with the mainstream consensus religion of oligarchic imperialism".
Oligarchic imperialism is the new dominant world religion. It's the scripture everyone reads. It's what forms our culture. It's what holy wars are fought over. It's what terrorism is committed for. It's what power is built around. It's what you're branded a heretic for rejecting.
It's just as fake as any other religion, just as crafted toward the advantage of the powerful as any other religion, and just as dependent upon blind faith in insubstantial narratives as any other religion. But it lets adherents feel smug and superior to other religious people.
Adherents of the old dominant religion used to read the Bible; adherents of the new dominant religion read The New York Times. Adherents of the old dominant religion used to go to church on Sunday; adherents of the new dominant religion go to Hollywood movies.
Adherents of the old dominant religion fought in the crusades; adherents of the new dominant religion kill families with drones and Tomahawk missiles overseas.
These labels exist because if mainstream platforms admitted that they refuse access to literally anyone who disagrees with status quo oligarchic imperialism, they would have to admit that they are in fact propagandists for a very specific belief system.
They would have to admit that they are not tasked with the responsibility of reporting the news, but with promoting the doctrine of the new dominant world religion. That they aren't news reporters, but high priests.
Religion isn’t disappearing, it has just changed its form.
Western imperialism is worse than every single issue the mass media are screaming in your face about on any given day. It is without exaggeration worse than 100 percent of those issues.
In a murderous, tyrannical theocratic empire, the only sane position to hold is that of heresy and apostasy. Hopefully one day mankind will open its eyes to reality and require no blind faith in any artificial belief constructs of any kind.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Oligarchic imperialism is the new dominant world religion. It's the scripture everyone reads. It's what forms our culture. It's what holy wars are fought over. It's what terrorism is committed for. It's what power is built around. It's what you're branded a heretic for rejecting.
Oligarchic imperialism is the new dominant world religion. Instead of reading the Bible adherents read The Guardian. Instead of going to church they see Hollywood movies. Instead of fighting a crusade they drop bombs. Instead of burning heretics they deplatform anti-imperialists.
Oligarchic imperialism is the new dominant world religion. It's just as fake as all other religions, just as power-serving as all other religions, and just as dependent on belief in insubstantial narrative constructs as all other religions. An old dynamic adapted for a new world.
This Is Your Brain On Echo Chambers: Right Calls Biden A Xi Puppet As He Packs His Cabinet With China Hawks
"Whenever someone tells you that a US president is going to be 'soft' on a nation the US government has marked as an enemy, you are being played." caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/this-is-your…
This is your brain. This is your brain on echo chambers.
Still getting dopey wingnuts in my mentions claiming Biden is going to bend the knee to China, even as he packs his administration full of virulent anti-China hawks. This is your brain on media echo chambers.
You shouldn't be worried about your government being too nice to China. You should be worried about your government ramping up a world-threatening multi-front cold war against two powerful nuclear-armed nations for the first time in human history.
Anyone who tells you a US president is going to be "soft" on a nation with which the US is actively in conflict, you are being played. Aways, always, always, always. It's just people manipulating you away from your natural, healthy inclination toward peace.
Surprise! America Is Getting Another Psycho For Secretary Of State
"Blinken is a liberal interventionist who has supported all of the most disgusting acts of US mass military slaughter this millennium, including the Iraq invasion" caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/surprise-ame…
Did you know the US Department of Defense used to be called the Department of War? It would be a much more honest label today for a military which virtually never operates in any way that could be described as defensive. Even better would be the Department of Eternal War.
So in practice the US ended up with two war departments: the DoD and the State Department. Which is why Secretaries of State are so jingoistic and psychopathic now, to the point where some sort of antisocial personality disorder is almost a job requirement for the position.
MSM Already Helping Next Administration Hide Corruption Under 'Diversity' Banner
There has never been a better time to be a woman, minority or member of the LGBT community who works in the DC establishment and thinks the poor should be made into pet food. caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/msm-already-…
The Times has published an article titled "Could Limiting Corporate Candidates Hurt Biden’s Diversity Push?", for the benefit of all those normal everyday readers who've been lying awake at night wondering if limiting corporate candidates might hurt Biden's diversity push.
NYT cites Paul Thornell of the influential DC lobbying firm Mehlman Castagnetti to warn us of the dangers of imperiling diversity by conceding too much to "the far left".