The way this is done is voters knowingly vote for a candidate who promises to break laws, or who has broken laws.

The Georgia voters who vote for Kelly Loeffler, for example, are choosing a form of government not based on rule of law.
So if, for example, a majority of voters choose a form of government not based on rule of law, rule of law will die.

How do you persuade such voters not to vote for lawbreakers?

Maybe we can't. Maybe we outnumber them.

Anti-democratic voters have always been with us. . .
The Trumps and McConnells and Loeffler supporters have always been with us. They supported slavery, which was obviously not "rule of law" in the sense we mean. They supported Jim Crow, which was obviously not democratic.
This is correct. When they talk about the "deep state" they mean the regulatory agencies and regulations that prevent [white] men from cheating and grabbing whatever they want.

They want to go back to the good old days--which was most of American history.
In the 19th century (and most of the 20th) we lived in a hierarchy (a patriarchy) with power concentrated in the hands of white men.

It was great (for white men)
🔹They could grab land!
🔹They could grab women!
🔹Before regulatory agencies, they could fix prices. . .
. . .and cheat.

Some people think that nature forms a hierarchy. They don't believe in equality because they don't believe people are equal.

See⤵️


They believe that laws that create "fairness" cheat and hamper THEM.
They break the laws that they do not believe should exist. Trump uses the pardon power to pardon people for breaking laws that he doesn't think should exist.

They don't like regulatory agencies (like the FBI) which look at white men who violate regulations.
The reason so many laborers do not support the party that supports labor is that they think their interests are more closely aligned to the hierarchy.

So they choose hierarchy over "fairness."
They choose lawbreakers over regulations.
Democracy is a form of government that derives from rule of law. The problem for many people is if you follow the precepts of democracy to the logical conclusion, you smash the hierarchy, and they don't want to do that.

So they vote against rule of law.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

27 Nov
This is the one I wrote about here, terikanefield-blog.com/what-the-heck-…, the one in which Giuliani made the unhinged argument in that some counties allowed voters to fix errors, and others didn't, therefore THROW OUT ALL THE BALLOTS.

1/
Here is the decision: assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2041…

Other people are quoting the scathing language and the fact that the decision was unanimous and written by a Trump appointee.

In other words this is a 🔥.

So I'll talk about what a 🔥 this is from a different angle.

2/
Team Trump filed a complaint in the federal district court arguing that the election was flawed on Constitutional grounds and should be overturned.

The reason for making the argument on Constitutional grounds was that they were hoping the Supreme Court would take it.

3/
Read 22 tweets
26 Nov
Trump going after the Georgia voting machines is likely to suppress the Republican vote in Georgia for the runoffs, which could hand the election (and the Senate) to the Democrats.

This is the likely result for a few reasons.

1/

washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…
Trump supporters in Georgia, who believe that Trump was robbed of the election partly because of the way Raffensperger conducted the election, and partly because of conspiracy theories about the machines, are angry and unlikely to vote.

washingtonpost.com/politics/trump…

2/
Raffensperger has already blamed Trump for suppressing his own voters. Trump kept saying mail-in ballots were not secure. Republicans who voted mail-in in the primary didn't vote at all in November.

3/

thehill.com/homenews/state…
Read 16 tweets
25 Nov
Trump personally benefits from pardoning Flynn, so the pardon is an abuse of power.

Abusing power is when you use the powers and privileges of your office for self-enrichment, and to subvert the national interests in favor of your own personal interests.

Sound familiar?

1/
If it sounds familiar, it's because that is exactly what Trump was impeached for⤵️

nbcnews.com/politics/trump…

Being able to pardon associates who commit crimes, or co-conspirators, or a person who is lying to shield the president is (to say the least) deeply problematic.

2/
Can something be done?
I believe this can (and will) be challenged in court. Who has standing? How it will be done? I need time to think that over.

Meanwhile, Adam Schiff has introduced legislation to make this impossible in the future.
schiff.house.gov/news/press-rel…

3/
Read 6 tweets
25 Nov
Have you ever noticed that the great leaders of the world, the ones who have brought about the most enduring and positive changes, did not go out of their way to stoke anger and rage?
I am personally not seeing anyone preaching that Trump should be forgiven.

Maybe I'm missing it, but almost every source I read understands that investigation will (and must) continue.

Maybe we just read different sources.
The Biden administration includes the FBI and DOJ.
Many of the investigations must happen in the Biden administration because that's where the records are.

But Biden himself must be disengaged, or we have the same corruption we had under Trump.
Read 11 tweets
25 Nov
Actually, Biden said that he intends to appoint an independent Attorney General and let the AG make prosecution decisions, which is as it should be.

Corruption = president influencing prosecutions.

Then when Biden makes a comment like "unity!" people attack him for. . .what?
Maybe once Trump is out of office people who want to stir outrage and anger will need to direct that outrage against the Democratic president for saying . . . "unity" and "let's stop demonizing each other."

Attacking someone for preaching unity makes us . . .what?
My deepest fright over the past 4 years was when I realized the extent to which Trump was influencing what the DOJ did.

Now people want Biden to do what Trump did: Put his fingers on the scales by announcing what he wants. . .

Read 6 tweets
24 Nov
This is a platitude. Don't talk about "justice."

Be specific about what you want.

I want:

💠The truth to come out
💠Investigations to continue unhampered
💠Independent prosecutors to decide what to prosecute.
💠All money obtained illegally to be returned.

You?

1/
I want:

💠Congress to pass a relief bill that gives relief to ordinary people.
💠The new administration to undo the damage to our institutions done by the previous administration, which will take a lot of work and focus on building back agencies so they can do their jobs.

2/
I also want people to understand the extent to which your emotions and rage have been manipulated by people who profit from keeping you riled.

When I went to law school, I vowed to use my legal degree for "justice" . . .
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!