This "bitcoin is better than gold" statement going around once more show that bitcoiners have no clue about monetary history and what the purpose of a monetary system is. A thread.
1- Metal standards were never inflexible; they could not in order to operate properly. Qty of metal was changed, usually lowered, to accommodate for changing economic conditions: price of metal, scarcity of coins, financial needs of economic units (state and private), etc.
2- The purpose of a monetary system is to make the rest of the economy go. It is there to accommodate financial needs. The more elastic one can design the supply, the better.
That doesn't mean that monetary creation & destruction shouldn't follow any rules & have no constraint.
3- Rules and constraint impose depend on economic system and evolve over time has we learn how to manage better the system. In a capitalist economy, the private sector is subject to the profitability constraint. We have learned from experience that this is not enough.
3 (ii) Financial stability requires a "hedge finance" constraint for most private agents: profitability should be judged on income gains, not capital gains.
In the government sector, the constraints are ressource availability and political constraints.
3 (iii) taxing, spending, financing of private sector by gov should be done with the goal of chaneling real ressources toward the societal "goods" and removing the "bads". What good and bad are is not necessarily obvious and requires broad political discussions.
3 (iv) The argument "but we don't have money" is a non-starter in these debates. Finance is flexible, debates should be on the things that are less so.
4- What bitcoiners want is a monetary system that is completely inflexible to the needs and aspirations of human beings. They want to give up the fight about what to use the monetary system for, by making it untouchable and uncontrollable.
5- Worse they focus all the attention of monetary outcome on capital gains. Monetary system would become a giant speculative game BY DESIGN. The exact thing that promotes instability and the exact thing we learn we should not to promote.
6- So yes there are power relations involved in the economy, yes banks do make improper credit decisions, yes government do mess up and are subject to power influence. The point is not to shut the monetary system but rather to work to remove the problems.
7- The bitcoin project is a rejection to participate in these debates and trying to change the system. It reflects a sense of powerlessness and a retreat to self-centered, "f...k everyone, i am in it just for myself" mentality. I am sorry to say that politics and power relations
7 (ii)- won't go away. You either work to change them or let other do it. What you don't do is prevent everyone to fight to change them in part via changes in monetary relations and instead promote a primitive and unstable monetary system that reinforce the problems. END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eric Tymoigne

Eric Tymoigne Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tymoignee

26 Nov
@dr_nrl @ShaneOliverAMP @bitterlion @stf18 @StephanieKelton @rch371 @NathanTankus @rohangrey @RaulACarrillo @billy_blog Quick comments on the "Keypoints"
1- MMT is not pro-monetary financing. We don't want to change central bank-treasury financial relation. We show that current/routine/normal financial relation ensure no financial constraint & that, as such, deficits are a financially sustainable.
@dr_nrl @ShaneOliverAMP @bitterlion @stf18 @StephanieKelton @rch371 @NathanTankus @rohangrey @RaulACarrillo @billy_blog 2- Yes below full emp there are free lunch/no opportunity cost. Unemp ressources are left unused. MMT did careful analysis of JG, GND, & student debt relief. Cost of JG is small in normal times GND is manageable if we start now (costlier the longer we wait). Benefits are large.
@dr_nrl @ShaneOliverAMP @bitterlion @stf18 @StephanieKelton @rch371 @NathanTankus @rohangrey @RaulACarrillo @billy_blog 2 (bis)- We are not for monetary financing. We are not for deficit either. We just note that deficit is a usual outcome (and explain why) and that fiscal balance is not a proper policy goal bc gov has little control over it (most G is non-discretionary, T is highly procyclical).
Read 7 tweets
24 Nov
Ok. In the mood of sharing a recipe:

Ham and Cheese Cake:

Ingredients:
4 eggs
200g of flower
300g of ham
200g of shredded cheese
1/2 expresso cup of milk
1 expresso cup of oil
One soup spoon of yeast
One loaf pan that is buttered and floured
1- Shred the ham
2- Beat the eggs
3- Mix flower and yeast and add bit by bit to eggs
4- Add ham and cheese and mix well
5- Put in loaf pan
6- Cook at 230F for 15 min
7- Cook at 390f for 45 min
Done.
Final product
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
An animated GIF of the financial balances through time. OECD countries. DPB: Domestic private sector balance, GB: Government balance, FB: Foreign balance.
DPB + GB + FB = 0
It looks to me that we can detect a cycle that reflects the business cycle. Start NE, goes SW, goes E, goes N. Start again. May be I am reading too much into it.
Better quality. made with this ezgif.com/maker
Read 5 tweets
23 Sep
The sectoral balance identity, 2015-2019 average (2018 for some), % of GDP. Source: OECD
DPB + GB + FB = 0
DPB: Domestic Private Balance
GB: Government Balance
FB: Foreign Balance
For more on how the graph is constructed: nakedcapitalism.com/2010/03/parent…
Whoops, forgot to change on of the label from data ("0.35") to country. You've got to do it manually, a real pain in the behind.
Read 4 tweets
9 Sep
Percent of Public Debt Held by the Public Held by the Fed: 1914-2019 Image
Hold it. I am revising this. Found a few issues.
REVISED VERSION (CORRECTION AND ADDITION) Image
Read 4 tweets
16 Jun
I am almost done with my study of the Roman monetary system (mostly from the denarius system to the fall of the western Roman Empire with a bit of intrusion into what happens "immediately" before and after). It has been a 6-month journey leading to 100 pages of notes. 1/
I have looked at the lit with a financial approach to monetary systems in mind (see my 2014 paper): did monetary instrument circulate at par?Why?Why not?What were the redemption mechanisms? did they work or not?What was the unit of account?Did it change?Who were the issuers?etc2/
I have not restricted myself to coins, that are at best only half of the story, but also have studied extensively banking where the work of Andreau, Harris, Bogaert, van Reden, and others are very helpful 3/
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!