3. Good teaching matters regardless of where students come from. At present, students who struggle the most are assigned to teachers least capable of providing great teaching. That is a national scandal.
4. No, teachers do not know best. Currently, Ed Schools draw teachers from the lower end of the collegiate pool and then fails to prepare them with evidence-based teaching knowledge. That is untenable.
5. No one-size-fits-all program will ever deliver a humane education to every American child. Parental choice of educational programs are not a threat to education, but a fulfillment of it.
6. Charter schools, like magnet schools, are neither the sole solution nor the sole problem in public education. They shouldn't be singled out for special critique while ignoring the inefficient traditional public schools for the same scrutiny.
7. Standardized testing is no more biased or inefficient than the unstandardized tests constructed by a nation of teachers who harbor biases and low-expectations for children of color. When you get fat, don't blame the scale.
7. Standardized test scores have been used for decades in the service of civil rights cases against states and school districts. Imagine erasing that data.
8. School boards are not models of democracy. In fact, most of the bad things that have happened to people of color in schools has happened under elected school boards.
9. Yes, there are no silver bullets in education. That doesn't mean there isn't usable knowledge about "what works" that isn't being employed in classrooms every day.
10. Per-Pupil funding is for the pupil, not the pedagogue. When families move a student, the per-pupil allotment moves with them. This isn't "siphoning," this is a child-centric system rather than a system-centric system.
Thinking people have to stop talking about public education with the emotive, illogical, and ahistorical happy talk.
No, public education is not and never has been the "cornerstone of democracy" or the "great equalizer" or a "public good." Trading in these memes stunts us.
In truth, the public education system was a Prussian project intended to create unthinking soldiers and model citizens/workers for elites to use. It may be too late to revisit the true origins of what is now a $750 billion public ignorance project, but there's time for truth.
How can you look at the boundary line used to assign students to "public" schools and not see the glaring red lines used to ghettoize some students into dream-killing failure factories and others into islands of unearned privilege?
Since we are kissing another Black History Month goodbye, and there have been so many posts about the importance of Black educators, I thought I'd offer a few historical points I gathered from Dr. Vannessa Siddle-Walker and old news stories.
In 1954 82,000 Black teachers taught 2 million Black children.
In the 11 years immediately following Brown, more than 38,000 Black teachers and administrators in 17 Southern and border states lost their jobs.
90% of Black principals lost their jobs in 11 Southern states.
Some of the Black teachers that kept their jobs were made to call the parents of every white student and ask for permission to teach their children.
Obviously, White teachers did not have to do this with Black parents.
A wealthy white woman (Diane Ravitch) starts a “grassroots” org (@NPEaction) with funding from a union leader (CTU) who had three houses (one in Hawaii!), and Warren Buffet’s daughter (Sherwood) and then...
they hire a white woman (Carol Burris) out of retirement from a white school district to work with a white male (Jeff Bryant) for-profit communications consultant who writes “reports” and articles and blog posts and ghostwritten campaign documents and talking points that...
are shared by a white woman (Valerie Strauss) with private school kids (Georgetown Day school) who has a permanent space in the Washington Post (owned by a billionaire btw). Then...
Wherever your political leanings, I hope there are moments where you rationally consider "what is true" to be more important than what you wish is true for political purposes.
First, progressive politics usually make a nod toward the proletariat, working people, the little guy.
But that's not Salon's audience. By their own admission: "Salon readers are affluent, well-educated and highly influential."
I suspect they're leaving out a racial descriptor.
Let's be real. Salon designer lifestyle media entity... a business. When they push narratives about money, influence, and accountability, you have to consider the fact they undisclosed space for "custom content."
You can never know who's behind one of their stories.
Open letter to people who are vying to be the arguable leader of the free world. I am watching you. There is nothing more important to me than the intellectual development of young people - especially those who have been marginalized by race, class, and perceived ability.
And...
I'm watching you, and listening to how serious you are about ensuring parents the rights and power to determine how, when, what, and where their children learn and grow.
And...
I'm listening to signs that you are bought and sold by the middle-class, college-educated, public employees in the education establishment more than the parents who are desperate for their children to have better learning opportunities.
American teachers' unions are waging war on charters and attacking school reform infrastructure. Key to their strategy is to create union assets in elected offices by either getting them elected, paying them off and/or ending their tenure as elected leaders when they disobey.
Their most effective message is to paint charters as unregulated hotbeds of fraud. It's a remarkable claim because while causing suspicion of charters, it also positions districts as exemplars of transparent institutions.