@sabhlok@markweinstein I fact MeWe is having the same ToS as all major platforms. It means the potential consequences are the same: It can censor if complaints/pressures are made (included by users or org like WHO) and as it see fit. mewe.com/terms
Clearly, speech privacy is not free speech.
@NemelkaJoe@Picss3o@naomirwolf@BrianOSheaSPI Wuhan lab is owned by France (who gave P4 status to Whuan lab), Canada/USA & China , not "just China". Those having shares in it are officials in Govts (Buzyn-Lévy in France) and Corps. Not a problem of conspiracy but an issue of cultism and opportunism be it created or not
@NemelkaJoe@Picss3o@naomirwolf@BrianOSheaSPI This is the one place in the world where those countries got together to work on VIH and coronaviruses.
All the same people imposing the recommendations around the world right now. Those promote against classical medicine (precision medicine) and for EBS only (vaccines).
@NemelkaJoe@Picss3o@naomirwolf@BrianOSheaSPI Minimally, this is the highest degree of conflict of interest I have ever seen. No possibility can be discarded in accordance to this simple fact.
@patbhamilton The way twitter is working (branching and balancing) means that when you post as a comment it appears for your followers more than for hers and
//next
@patbhamilton and except if you posted the comment early on so it is up in the thread and people are seeing it when reading her post - even this is no guarantee b/c info displayed might vary from a user to another).
//next
@patbhamilton Minimally you need a tool that allows you to know the origin of those answering your poll (following her or you or both or neither). Without this no way to determine the group targeted.
//next
Pro-lockdown/masks & anti-early ttts countries are doing the same or worse (CA,FR,UK,US, AU, etc.).
This only proves that LCKDNs and MSKs are useless and that *prophylactic & early* ttts & *healthy* population are decisive. Modern healthcare system based on EBM/EBS have failed.
@Guss_Finknottle@ArmyofShadows2 If I may add a word of advice. You sure can do has you see fit for yourself but at a population level, the balance risk/benefit is simply not here. Quite the opposite. People willing to wear a face protection should consider face shields instead.