This Day in Labor History: November 27, 1937. The International Ladies Garment Workers Union (ILGWU) debuted its play “Pins and Needles,” which would become the longest running musical of the 1930s. Let's talk about the labor feminism of this era!
This cultural form of labor feminism at a time when organized labor was dominated by male workers is a vital and important moment both in the cultural history of work but also in the history of women and work.
The ILG was founded in 1900 and despite conservative leadership, became the union that New York garment workers organized in during the Uprising of the 20,000 in 1909 and the aftermath of the Triangle Fire in 1911.
During the 1920s and early 1930s, it was riven with strife between radicals and anti-radicals, leading to labyrinthine power struggles not worth revisiting here except to say that the constantly shifting ideology of the Communist Party ultimately hurt the radical cause.
Eventually David Dubinsky rose to lead the ILG in 1932.
Dubinsky consolidated control quickly, ruling the union with an iron fist, which was ultimately undemocratic but also turned it into a functional organization instead of one constantly in turmoil from infighting among political factions.
The union also was dominated by male leadership despite the fact that the large majority of its membership was women. Labor feminism would struggle to develop internally in such a structure.
The ILG’s Educational Department sought to create cultural productions and artistic outlets for its members that included art, dance, and theater. In 1934, the Educational Department reorganized and created a theater troupe made up of union members.
These weren’t professional actors. The were just everyday women working in the garment industry whose union thought it would be useful to enhance their creativity, an idea that is far away from unionism of recent decades.
Louis Schaffer led this effort and he had a vision to bring the labor movement to the extremely popular cultural form of Broadway productions. ILG president David Dubinsky thought this was a great idea. Schaffer recruited professionals to write the play and train the actors.
A cast of 55 mostly female garment workers were trained to become actors. This took time to accomplish. He could have brought in professionals, but in his determination to make this a truly working-class production, he had to teach the workers how to act.
This would ultimately delay the production’s opening by about 18 months. It finally opened to the public on November 27, 1937, after several practice performances.
The production was written and directed by men, but centered women operating in the larger political struggles of the time. Schaffer wanted Pins and Needles to entertain working class people by focusing on working class issues.
In order to accomplish this mission, Pins and Needles did not have a set script. The workers themselves constantly reworked the songs, making them about themselves.
There were anti-Mussolini songs and other songs about the international anti-fascist struggle, but as the play developed over its many performances, it ultimately became much more about the women and their lives. Labor feminism became the play’s central theme.
The critics largely loved the show. It had good tunes, catchy lyrics, and everything that the public would want in a popular production. At first, it only played on the weekends because the workers were still full-time employees in garment factories.
Eventually, they were able to obtain leaves from their jobs to perform full time. The cast also expanded into a second set for late afternoon shows that could reach workers who could not attend in the evenings.
As the labor politics of the 1930s often went, there was a lot of talk about racial equality within the ILG and with the cast of Pins and Needles, but not much actual racial equality in practice.
The first black cast member was Olive Pearman, who had only a small supporting role as a seamstress.
Black unionists sharply criticized Schaffer for ignoring black voices and he later did add a couple of black cast members, but no Latino cast members were ever hired on the production.
Other cast members were pressured to suppress their Jewish identities and even change their names. And of course when the production was on the road, it was subject to local segregationist laws, which it did not try to challenge.
The cast itself was quite leftist, although Schaffer himself was anti-communist and some fired cast members claimed they were redbaited out of the production. Dorothy Tucker, one of the actors, remembered, “there were a few socialists and a few communists among us.”
n March 1938, the cast went to Washington DC to play at the White House for Franklin Roosevelt. The first road show began in April 1938 with shows in Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, and San Francisco, among other cities.
As demand grew, more workers joined the production, but Schaffer also brought more professional and semi-professional actors into the production, causing tensions behind the scenes. The first road show ended in January 1939, after 319 performances in 34 cities.
The cast and show continued to change and professionalize, as most of the workers did eventually have to head back to their jobs in the garment factories.
New versions of the production formed until finally, after 1104 performances, the show closed in New York in June 1940. It then went on the road for one last tour, closing for good in Los Angeles in May 1941.
As World War II began and the left-leaning unions moved toward supporting the war effort, Popular Front cultural productions began to fade, collapsing completely in the Cold War backlash after the war. No major labor plays ever followed up on Pins and Needles.
I can’t really argue that the failure to center working class cultural productions really made much difference in terms of shaping the future of the labor movement.
But the end of a creative labor movement seeking the broader production of a specific working class culture is ultimately something lost.
For more on Pins and Needles in the broader context of the Popular Front, see Michael Denning, The Cultural Front: The Laboring of American Culture in the Twentieth Century.
Back tomorrow with another thread on Cuban cigar organizing in Tampa (similar to yesterday's thread but decades earlier).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erik Loomis

Erik Loomis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ErikLoomis

28 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 28, 1901. A Cuban cigar workers strike in Tampa collapses. Let's use this to talk about transnational organizing in favor of Cuban nationalism! Image
Tampa was a small town in the late nineteenth century. But a growing cigar industry began transforming it into a locally important center. The center of cigar production was in an area called Ybor City.
It was founded by a Cuban cigar manufacturer named Vicente Martinez Ybor, who moved production north in the 1880s to avoid the growing tension in Cuba between the Spanish government and nationalists that would eventually lead to American intervention in 1898.
Read 35 tweets
26 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 26, 1931. Cigar factory owners in Ybor City, Florida, banned cigar makers from having people read to workers on the job. Workers struck and it's a great example of the loss of worker autonomy on the shop floor. Let's talk about it! Image
While U.S. economic investment in Cuba had started fairly early in the 19th century, it wasn’t until the 1860s that the nation saw any significant Cuban migration back to the U.S.
Naturally enough, when that started, much of it was based in Florida, which at the time was a rural economic backwater, as well as to New York. In the Tampa area, Cubans made up much of the workforce of the growing cigar industry.
Read 27 tweets
26 Nov
Anyone who says we are not in this for the money are....very wrong. Sure, if I wanted to make actual money I'd be in some other profession, but that doesn't mean that I don't deserve money for my labor. Same with everyone.
And the fact that I don't make real money is not because I am doing some public service. It's that the capitalist world does not value what I do because I don't create wealth for capitalism.
One other point is that it feels very weird to say this given that half or more of the people who have PhDs in the last 10 years are under/unemployed in the profession they trained for. And so you are made to feel guilty to talk about these things.
Read 5 tweets
25 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 25, 1865. Mississippi created the first Black Code, attempting to reinstitute slavery in all but name. Let's talk about how far southern whites would go to ensure bound Black labor!
First, it's important to remember again that slavery was fundamentally a labor system. That was the point. Yes, it was based on race. But the point was that whites would have non-whites working for them with no rights in perpetuity. Everything else was secondary to that.
The impact of slavery’s end is hard to overestimate. But the Emancipation Proclamation did not free any slaves immediately and the ratification of the 13th Amendment did not take place until well after the war’s end.
Read 32 tweets
23 Nov
This Day in Labor History: November 23, 1903. Colorado governor James Peabody sent the state militia to Cripple Creek to crush a Western Federation of Miners led strike. Let's again talk about the state-corporate alliance that is the biggest reason for labor's struggles! Image
This all too typical action by the state during the Gilded Age had major repercussions.
It succeeded in ending the strike, but it also led the WFM to lead the movement for a nationwide and even worldwide movement of industrial workers that would challenge a capitalism the miners no longer believed would ever work for them.
Read 36 tweets
22 Nov
This is very interesting and I think one of the lessons of the 2020 elections is how much white liberalism is the dominant ideology of electoral politics among both liberals AND the left. So often, we aren't even asking the right questions.

nytimes.com/2020/11/20/opi…
So often, whites are so concerned with being "allies" for instance that we reaching with massive ignorance into questions inside of communities about which the dynamics of which they know absolutely nothing.
Just as an example here--the whole "Latinx" thing. Regardless of its merits, white liberals have picked up on it as THE way to talk about this population if we want to be allies. And OK, but when only 3% of the actual population uses it, it's not really reaching out to them.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!