Timeline of PA case.
1) case was filed quickly as evidence was being gathered.(due to time constraints)
2) original charges were of things that evidence could prove (poll watchers removed/cured ballots)
3) intent was to amend filing as more evidence was gathered
1) case was filed quickly as evidence was being gathered.(due to time constraints)
2) original charges were of things that evidence could prove (poll watchers removed/cured ballots)
3) intent was to amend filing as more evidence was gathered
4) Federal Judge Bann refused to allow filing to be amended.
5) Federal Judge Bann refused evidence to be presented
6) Federal Judge Bann dismissed case
7) PA state senators held hearing Wed to allow evidence to be presented to public (evidence was clear cut)
5) Federal Judge Bann refused evidence to be presented
6) Federal Judge Bann dismissed case
7) PA state senators held hearing Wed to allow evidence to be presented to public (evidence was clear cut)
8) non-amended case(denied Trump lawyers twice on amending the case) with no evidence allowed to be presented in court was dismissed by 3rd circuit of appeals.
9) appeal to SCOTUS ongoing.
9) appeal to SCOTUS ongoing.
After watching the PA Senate hearing on Wed, it's clear that evidence exists and the case should be allowed to be amended and presented in a court of law.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
