Do publications like fact-check articles and editorials on electoral politics for basic logic and accuracy before publishing or nah. I mean feel free to DM me if you need that done.
Like if you're talking about down-ballot Democrats under-performing Biden, maybe don't have your main examples be Starr County and Zapata County, where they over-performed Biden, @jacobinmag. That kind of thing.
Or publishing, in the New York Times, that "the number of registered voters in Georgia has decreased since 2012", in August 2018.
I definitely think it's gotten better, over my long time following this stuff, but I still see this sort of thing more than I should...or am I cherry-picking...
Everyone makes mistakes, lord knows I do, but especially at like big papers and organizations, there should be people checking stuff, right?
A lot of these media outlets, they have in-house quantitative people now, who I think often do a very good job, but then in the opinion sections, it's anything goes.
(And the "straight news but not done by the in-house quantitative people", I guess that's probably somewhere in between.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Xenocrypt

Xenocrypt Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @xenocryptsite

28 Nov
Are India and China really so much more internally and uniformly dense than anywhere else, or is that some kind of Census boundary translation artifact?
I think this is actually how cartogram-type maps can be misleading in the opposite way as normal maps. Asia is "just" 60% of global population, you know, a lot, but not 80% or 90%.
Like yeah the first map makes it look like nobody lives in Clinton counties, but the second map makes it look like EVERYONE lives in Clinton counties, and that's wrong, too.
Read 4 tweets
28 Nov
SAG ensemble nomination rules are a travesty.
"Crazy Rich Asians" only nominated one of the three people in this widely-used press photo, sorry, Koh Chieng Mun and Nico Santos. But sure nominate Harry Shum Jr. for his two-second credit cookie cameo.
Read 4 tweets
28 Nov
Note to county election sites: If you have a fancy precinct webmap etc, that's great and all, but then that means you have the precinct data in a machine-readable format, so can you just...also share that, thank you, Xenocrypt.
(Sometimes one can do this anyway with view-source and such, but...extra work.)
Chester County, Pennsylvania went with "let's make each precinct a separate PDF".
Read 4 tweets
28 Nov
Haven't clicked behind the paywall but I am skeptical of the initial framing that Democrats' main problem in state legislative races was "Biden/downballot R voters".
They mention a district here and there that voted Biden/R, but there's nothing comprehensive...
What's the counterfactual? Is it "what if literally every Biden voter voted D straight down the ballot, AND Ds also had their Trump voters who voted D downballot"? IE, "what if Ds won TX-24 AND still held WI-03"? Or is it "what if no ticket-splitting"?
Read 10 tweets
27 Nov
So from what I can tell, people like "The Mandalorian" because of its stand-alone episodes and disconnection from the main "Star Wars" universe, and they're also very excited it's bringing in famous characters and building an overarching story?
I remember when I liked "Arrow" because it was refreshingly grounded, practical, and limited...
And then of course they used that to "world-build" the complete opposite of that. I guess it was popular for a while but it never really fit for me (especially since the CW's budget and production style was uh, a little more suited to grounded, limited plots).
Read 8 tweets
27 Nov
Incredible how the biggest star/career launched by "American Idol", 20 years later, is...Ryan Seacrest.
The guy whose job was...to say "welcome back to American Idol" four times an episode. But he seen his opportunities and he took 'em.
The only person in show business under 75 who aspired to be Dick Clark, and he got it. Inspiring really.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!