Extremely feeling this and the entire rant that precedes it. I don't think Tom is fluent in Woke, but the phenomena he's talking about here have names: white innocence & white fragility. Patterns of behavior & rhetoric familiar from, eg, Confederate states in the runup to the CW.
It's always the same. No matter how much cruelty & suffering they impose, however unjust the cultures they build, they are always the victims -- of misunderstanding, of condescension -- and it is always everyone else who's obliged to "reach out" & understand them better.
That's the dumbest part of it. "We need to understand Trump voters better." Guess what? They aren't that fucking complicated! They've told us, through their words & behavior, what motivates them. It's a group dynamic as old as humanity; it dominates US history. We get it!
In US politics, "understand them better" just means "don't hold them responsible for what they say & do." That's always been it. Hold white conservatives blameless, even as they kick you in the face, because ... well, they're upset. They don't feel special like they used to.
Finally, this is almost too obvious to point out, but look at how subaltern groups in the US are treated -- Black people, gay people, immigrants, take your pick. When they grow frustrated & lash out, does the establishment rush to say "we need to understand them better"? Ha.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Negative emissions technologies (NETs) are absolutely serving as a permission structure to continue emitting GHGs. Just as CCS subsidies in the US will serve as a permission structure to continue politics/business as usual.
All right fine a quick thread on this. The main job of reducing emissions is substituting clean techs for their dirty counterparts -- techs that produce the same goods & services, w/out the CO2 emissions. Some of those alternatives are mature & cheaper already (RE) ...
... while some are at the demonstration or even lab phase. But *even the techs that are mature & cheaper* are proving a challenge to substitute fast enough, because of politics. Again: we're having trouble *substituting something cleaner & cheaper* for the same work.
Among the many reasons this is horseshit, this whole genre of liberal-scolding rests on the premise that the offended heartlanders are responding to what Dems actually say -- the intramural debates in which people like Dowd are involved. They're not!
By & large, Trump's base has no idea what Dems actually say or do. They are responding to a ludicrous caricature they see on RW media (& RW social media). They are responding to lies & conspiracy theories. Dems changing how they talk *won't change any of that*.
Just got done reading The Cold Millions, the newish book by @1JessWalter. It is set amidst the labor struggles of the early 20th century, out west (Spokane & Seattle). It hit me so hard; then as now, the fight for social justice is bloody & frustrating & often seems futile.
But it also shows that all these futile actions, all these frustrations & lost battles, somehow, over time, add up to progress, thanks to people who fight no matter what, even in the face of violence & loss. Couldn't be more timely.
Should also add: it's a fantastic read! I'd place it a notch beneath Beautiful Ruins (my favorite audiobook ever), but completely worth your time. bookshop.org/books/the-cold…
Sorry, commenters, you're wrong: Rise of Skywalker is the worst Star Wars movie & the worst movie of the modern era. The prequels were extremely bad, but TRoS was extremely bad in a *worse way*. It was the worst in the worst way one can be worst.
The sequels were bad in a "auteur with no ear for dialogue & no feeling for actors is given way too much money & freedom & creates a towering, relentlessly clunky, narratively overpacked oddity." I don't wanna watch them, but I can forgive, or at least live with, them.
Here's a thing I wrote about America's new climate ambassador, John Kerry, back when he was just running a climate advocacy group. vox.com/energy-and-env…
I think it's great that Kerry is in this role but, let's be honest, there's no human on earth who can spin or fool other world leaders about the US & climate at this point. They know our promises are good ONLY until another Republican is elected.
What can he tell them? Yes, Biden will issue climate rules via executive authority, like Obama did; he'll say the right things & be a productive negotiating partner, like Obama was. But, just like with Obama, all that work could easily be nuked in 2024, like it never happened.
Wow, I didn't expect much from this podcast ("not a monolith," ok, we get it!) but it turned out to be a total mind blower. @IanHaneyLopez cuts through the "woke vs. shut-up-about-woke" debate in an incredibly productive & thoughtful way. Recommended. stitcher.com/show/the-ezra-…
One insight I wish everyone on the left could hear: the anti-racist message of siding with the oppressed & dispossessed is NOT necessarily appealing to all of the vast category of people we call "people of color." It's certainly not *automatically* appealing.
At the same time, "moderates" need to hear that racial messaging is not some separate thing from economics. The most appealing message, in surveys, is that *rich people are using race to divide & screw working people*.