The brain-fog that comes from the highly unusual demographics and environment of journalists is actually worse than @DKThomp describes here. Because there is an added layer: we work in an industry that's been in recession for more than a decade. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
@DKThomp Journalists' perspective on the economy is shaped by that environment: Everything perpetually lean and getting worse, with a plausible story about the Big Tech companies being to blame. It leads to coverage that is cynical, pessimistic, and out of touch with the broad public.
@DKThomp The political facts on the ground about the economy through 2019 -- tight labor markets, good wage growth, and the best public satisfaction with the economy in 20 years -- were simply not perceptible to so many writers, in part because things sucked so much in our industry.
Journalists are, of course, especially sensitive to the economic concerns of people who went to expensive colleges (including state university flagships) and earn less than many of their peers -- because that describes so many journalists -- but it's not most of the public.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
These international comparisons are virtually always incorrect, and always in the direction of overstating the generosity of foreign systems. To take one example: The Italian subsidy is 80% of wages *up to a cap* around €1,200 per month.
In fact, the US fiscal response has to date been larger than is typical in other wealthy countries, relative to our GDP. The smaller headline numbers for total spending in the European packages shows they're not as big or as universal as you think. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
"Indeed, the U.S. provided fiscal support equivalent to roughly 12 percent of its GDP, data from Moody’s Analytics show, one-third more than Germany and twice as much as the U.K. Other than Australia, no large, wealthy country did more to support its economy."
One silver lining of this year’s smaller Thanksgivings is the opportunity to try out recipes you might not if you were feeding twelve people. Here are my herb-rubbed racks of veal, going in the fridge to rest before roasting this afternoon.
That’s this recipe, though I think I’m going to roast slowly on 250 and then crank up the heat at the end to brown instead of browning first. foodandwine.com/recipes/roaste…
Veal rib roast with pan gravy, green beans with garlic and thyme, Ina Garten’s savory bread pudding with apple and herbs, and cranberry pepper relish.
5-4 but if you read the Chief’s dissent it sounds like it could well be 6-3 in the event that New York sought to reimpose the restrictions in dispute (which were lifted for now due to improving COVID conditions in the relevant neighborhoods)
The plaintiffs here have a point about these restrictions not being neutral— certainly in secular contexts, liberals have tended to notice how arbitrarily some risk activities are permitted and others prohibited— and governments may need to think on how to draw more neutral ones.
For example, there are certain aspects of religious ceremonies, like singing indoors, that pose particular risk and could be prohibited in secular and religious contexts. And houses of worship can be subjected to capacity limits in line with secular institutions.
Other things: Many voters were confused by New York's unusual fusion voting system, where both Biden and Trump appeared on two different ballot lines. If you vote for the same candidate twice, your vote DOES count, for the party that appears leftmost (D for Biden, R for Trump)
But if a voter does that, the ballot scanner nonetheless flags it as an overvote. And because you shouldn't ask the voter exactly how they overvoted or discuss their intent, we just had to send them to spoil their ballots and get new ones to mark only once.