The problem with conservatism: Putting university endowments on the hook for student loan debt would not only offer a solution to an issue for younger voters, but it would inevitably result in the closer of many universities which conservatives claim to hate 1/
Universities, conservatives complain, are the locus of critical race and gender theory, of antifa and BLM, of the overproduction of woke "elites." Conservatives, who always claim to be about the culture war, have a stone in front of them capable of knocking out several birds 2/
But their adherence to free market dogma, to libertarian principles, to broke "business conservatism" is like a gag reflex that prevents them from drinking the right stuff at the right moment. So they ironically take the side of the universities in this fight 3/
Which is one of the reasons why contemporary conservatism will never win the culture wars it LARPs about fighting. It is at bottom about conserving institutions and things, not fundamentally changing them, as they claim to want to do 4/
Put universities on the hook with their endowments and end student loans to boot? Nope. Something something markets principles 5/
Re my first tweet: *closure. RIP 6/
Conservatism is basically complain porn, insofar that it complains about a whole bunch of stuff but pulls back from the implications of the solutions to the problems conservatives gripe about. "Whoa, that's crazy, can't we just do a more moderate version of this problem?" 7/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is no reason to exclude them but to cope or deny. Which highlights a problem: We think it's just the people around Trump, not in his inner circle, who are the poison pills.
"Because they said Republicans," yes, hilarious then that two Democrats are the most influential people in the administration.
Consider: What prevents us from being able to "deal with it" is conservatism. Hate affluent liberal citadels all you want, it is conservatism that places the GDP on a pedestal and, in the name of the free market or something, refuses to assail these citadels where it hurts 1/
Want to own the libs? Aggressively attack the practice of global labor arbitrage, abolish visa workers programs, raise taxes on liberal plutocrats, i.e., do exactly the opposite of what conservatism says you should do 2/
Trump hasn't been good at this at all, see constant GDP/stock market tweets, but you can argue that at least he occasionally if unwittingly pointed in the right direction, but it will ultimately be on us to consciously, deliberately separate from conservatism 3/
Milovan followed James Burnham's method from the left and it shows in his analysis of communism (really just political bureaucracy) not as a theory but as a system. He is not concerned with formal principles but real power structures 1/
I think the historic left is better at this than the right/conservatives due to the left generally being more associated with materialism and the right generally looking to the transcendent 2/
As a result the left generally has a better pathology of power than the right, which instead tends to debate formal principles and theories 3/
"Charges of unfairness are serious," Judge Stephanos Bibas wrote. "But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here." Bibas is a Trump appointee. washingtontimes.com/news/2020/nov/…
One indicator that Trump, and his base, had entered troubled waters was when the GOP's scam judicial strategy was celebrated as serious "America First" policy. But "conservative" judges and the courts won't save you...
The judicial strategy gives conservatives the illusion that courts and judges provide them with a safety net while providing Republican politicians with an excuse for not actually legislating. "Vote for us so we can appoint more judges!" When that became "MAGA," it was a bad omen
While Trump rages against the press and refuses to concede, Javanka appear eager to get on with what they are sure is Trump's loss. These two were among the first to ask Trump to concede and it's irrelevant if Trump's supporters don't believe that 1/ nytimes.com/2020/11/24/us/…
So while Trump does his thing, Javanka are already looking on to life beyond the White House, having thoroughly hijacked and derailed a whole presidential term, because these two are as transactional as it gets 2/
And they made sure to use the White House to build their own portfolios and grow their own networks and establish themselves as political players and build up their cronies 3/
They are the biggest victims of interracial violence and police shootings yet perennially play the part of public enemy numero uno 2/
They are the butt of every joke, they are not allowed to celebrate their heroes and symbols and myths, but are contioned to worship the "Other" instead and denigrate and ignore what is theirs 3/