Some, like prices going up or border disruptions, might.
But it is also likely to disproportionately negatively affect some sectors and regions.
/2
And here the immediate impact can be very different from the long term one.
The immediate one being the first few months (up to a year) of general confusions and realisation of all the additional costs and the loss of various possibilities.
/3
Worth remembering with the additional simplifications it's not just one change - its several changes between Jan and July.
/4
And then the slow but permanent shifts in supply chains, perhaps also competitiveness and productivity.
With the new trade deals having to work much harder than they should to offset some of this negative impact.
/5
At this point almost impossible to predict all of the effects a deal (limited) or a no-deal Brexit will have.
But the first 6 months should give us a good indication of the general direction of travel.
/6
Can you still call it Project Fear if it's actually happening? Guess we'll see.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I agree. S&S declarations are an interesting one cause I honestly can't understand why (to my knowledge) we did not ask for a waiver similar to what NO & CH have.
A waiver would also make the Irish Sea border a lot simpler.
Recently @pmdfoster prompted me to check the agreements to see if the S&S declarations waiver was related to Single Market commitments or anything else that could make it impossible for the UK and the EU to agree on one.
/2
This is what the Norwegian customs says about this wavier
An important point to make - the EU is applying full procedures to UK goods as of 1 Jan cause that is what it’s obliged to do under international rules.
The EU shares borders with countries with a much closer economic relationship than the one we'll likely to end up with – why should goods from these countries be subject to full customs and other border procedures and goods from the UK not?
(WTO Art I) 👇
/2
I appreciate we never expected them to apply these rules to US, but to be fair we've known for 4 years that "we've got to be ready for the requirements that they have been clear apply to all third countries.”
/3
I can't find the original report commissioned by @ScotConvention but I'm starting to think the quote relates to EU nations and the borders between them.
Cause when you're talking about external EU borders - in particular with countries that do not have access to SM the friction is real. Reports are helpful but you can also check real-time info on the waiting times on these borders.
/2
Not going to go into "not everyone is stopped" - you remember coming from back from a non-EU country and not having to show your passport? Me neither.
But agree on not every truck being checked. Of course. Selective, spot checks only depending on the capacity at the border.
/3
Gov's "time is running out" ads may seem strange in light of how much guidance is still missing (hello, the Irish Sea border). However, believe it or not, they are needed and various stakeholders have been asking for them.
There are still so many companies that are not doing all they need to do before 1 Jan. It's not easy, and yes, there is guidance missing.
But companies also need to take some responsibility for their readiness - even though this is not a situation they should be in.
/2
This campaign is better than the previous "pst, something is happening at the end of the year" one. Call to action and I'd even like them to say - if you don't act now you might not be able to move your goods.
/3
First stop Canada. Yes, we rolled it over and agreed to re-negotiate. That’s great (although doesn’t really give us full continuity). But it’s a success.
And then there is this 👇
/2
Women’s economic empowerment and the environment - two of the areas where FTA provisions are pretty much "nice to have": don’t change much, are on best endeavours principle and the work needs to anyway be done domestically by each party.
/3