Congress can wait: How Biden can reshape our future with executive action.
POTUS has enormous power to act based on existing laws. Rather than gnash our teeth over lost opportunities, let's focus on how much can be done, per @ddayen at @TheProspect: 1/6 salon.com/2020/11/29/con…
14 months ago, @ddayen at @TheProspect laid out the scope of what a Democratic POTUS could do without Congress, long before anyone else was thinking about it. Cancelling student debt was just the tip of the iceberg: 2/6 prospect.org/day-one-agenda…
This month, @jeffspross made an even deeper argument regarding long-term power to defeat Trumpism. It has 3 main parts: 1) The only way to defeat Trumpism is by repeated electoral victories ala the New Deal forcing the GOP to change. 3/6 prospect.org/day-one-agenda…
2) And winning repeatedly, decisively requires policies, like Social Security, that can build mass constituencies: 4/6
3) Passing new laws is great for building mass constituencies. But executive actions can do a great deal on their own--and help gain power to do more: 5/6
These are some highlights. Read the whole story, "Congress can wait: How Biden can reshape our future with executive action." here: salon.com/2020/11/29/con…
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Feeling crazed? Want some distance? My author interview re "Conservatism: The Fight For A Tradition" explores a broader historical framework (2 centuries 4 countries) for understanding Trump: 1/10 salon.com/2020/10/24/how…
Conservatism is first a fight against the modern world, but also has an internal fight between those who accommodate to it ("liberal conservatives") & those who resist it (the "hard right") as well as specific historical factions. 2/10
Regarding the first fight, "What conservatives reckon they're resisting has changed as modern liberal life has changed". They fought both liberalism ("which lays out the feast") & democracy ("which draws up the guest list"): 3/10
Contra #NeverTrump narratives, Trump pushing US toward racial civil war has a *very* long history in white thought, which the right especially has nurtured, as @4GWDOTDOTDOT explores in a new report & discusses with me at @Salon: 1/9 salon.com/2020/09/26/beh…
As @philipplenz6 told me, "We need to be careful we don't get into a whack-a-mole game," but instead try "to find solutions that come from the bottom up, to think about how to change the system itself." Key problems are asymmetry of knowledge & intransparency: 3/10
In *Demagogue for President* @jenmercieca explains how Trump uses 6 rhetorical strategies to exploit 3 pre-existing weaknesses in the public: distrust, polarization and frustration. My @Salon author interview: 1/9 salon.com/2020/07/04/the…
Trump uses 3 rhetorical strategies to unify his supporters, and 3 divide the public as a whole. 1st unifying strategy is *ad populum*—appeal to the crowd: 2/9
Trump's 2nd unifying strategy is American exceptionalism: 3/9
Globalization is a process that's repeatedly happened in waves, which often break in pandemics like Covid-19. To find our way forward we need to understand the forces involved, not just the virus. At @Salon 1/18 salon.com/2020/05/07/doe…
While Covid-19's mortality rate is lower than previous pandemics, neoliberal globalization is *deliberately* more fragile & future pandemics loom. *Resilience* should be a guiding principle in response. 2/18
ICYM, new book, *Taking America Back for God* by @ndrewwhitehead & @socofthesacred, explains Christian nationalism's key role in shaping our polarized politics--including electing Trump. My @Salon author interview here: 1/14 salon.com/2020/02/29/soc…
A 2018 study by @ndrewwhitehead & @socofthesacred found that "voting for Trump was, at least for many Americans, a symbolic defense of the United States' perceived Christian heritage" aka "Christian nationalism." Their book paints a much broader picture of its influence. 2/14
They make 3 main arguments: 1) "understanding Christian nationalism, its content and its consequences, is essential for understanding much of the polarization in American popular discourse" --not just supporters, but opponents & two groups in between. 3/14