What happens to the mRNA vaccine particle (Pfizer/Moderna) once it gets injected into your muscle? Short thread based on #TWiV 687. Thanks to @BioProfBarker for the explanation! (1/n)
There are two or three places where it can end up.
1. It can enter some local muscle cells. The vaccine mRNA is translated into protein inside those cells and that protein is recognized by immune cells are foreign, ultimately leading to production of antibodies and T cells. (2/
2. It can enter local dendritic cells, which are known as "professional antigen-presenting cells". As soon as the vaccine mRNA is translated into protein inside these cells, that protein will be recognized as foreign... (3/n)
and the dendritic cells will head to the lymph node, where they will present it on their surface to T cells of the immune system. (4/n)
3. It can enter local muscle cells, which immediately die due to the trauma caused by injection. Those dead muscle cells will then be swallowed by dendritic cells and the mRNA will then follow a similar path as described in 2) above. (end)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Questions about the Johnson & Johnson vaccine? In this post, I describe the composition of the vaccine, the clinical trial results, and how it compares to the other vaccines in use. Also at #virologyblog. (1/n)
On February 27, 2021, the FDA issued an emergency use authorization for a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The vaccine was developed by Janssen Pharmaceutica, a Belgium-based division of Johnson & Johnson, in collaboration with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. (2/n)
Perhaps the most exciting feature of this new vaccine is that it only requires one dose to be effective in inducing an immune response. (3/n)
There is currently a resurgence of COVID-19 in Manaus, Brazil, despite the fact that about 76% of the population had been previously infected with SARS-CoV-2, which would normally lead to herd immunity. What is the cause of this resurgence? Short Thread. (1/n)
The truth is, nobody knows, but there are at least four mutually exclusive possibilities: (2/n)
1) The attack rate could have been overestimated during the first wave, meaning that the population remained below herd immunity. Attack rate is the percentage of an at-risk population that contracts the disease during a specified time interval. (3/n)
As more and more people are vaccinated, one of the major questions is whether or not the vaccines protect only from disease, or both from disease and infection. Short thread. (1/n)
Even if they completely prevent disease in a vaccinated person, there is a chance that that person can still become infected, replicate virus to a certain extent, possibly to a sufficient level to infect another (unvaccinated) person. 2/n)
The studies analyzing this feature of SARS-CoV-2 immunity are well under way. Here are results from one such study from Israel, which is ahead of the rest of the world in the vaccination process. (3/n)
Vaccines, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibodies.
What is the difference between these three things and what do they have in common? A thread. (1/n)
The major shared feature is that they all involve the action of antibodies, but the source of the antibodies and their durability is vastly different. (2/n)
Vaccines present or lead to the presentation of an antigen (e.g., a piece of a virus) that induces your immune system to make your own antibodies. Those antibodies stay in your body for a long time and are affiliated with an immune memory that lasts even longer. (3/n)
It is now a little more than a year since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, and we already have several highly effective vaccines against this virus. (2/n)
Because of my previous research experience in vaccine science, I was very skeptical about the promise of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine this soon. I was wrong, and I could not be happier about that. (3/n)
What are bioRxiv and medRxiv? They are servers where anybody can self-publish a scientific article. Legitimate journals put a submitted research paper through pretty rigorous peer review, but the publications on these "preprint" servers are not peer reviewed. Thread. (1/n)
As you might imagine there can be quite a bit of junk on there, including the paper that has been making headlines, allegedly showing that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse transcribed and integrated into the human genome. (2/n)
The conditions under which these experiments were done were extremely artificial, where probably just about any RNA would have been reverse transcribed and integrated. But the authors didn't show that. (3/n)