1. Did you know that this isn't the first time Georgia's Dominion voting machines crashed or suffered a "glitch?"
The same thing happened a few months ago in September.
2. "Election officials initially thought they would have to rebuild the database but then discovered they could fix the problem through a software change"
How the hell do you go from a completely corrupted and unusable database to just needing a software update?
3. And in September Eric Coomer (yes that guy) told  U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg  that the problem had to do with the way the voting machines communicate with the underlying Android operating system. He told Totenberg "a minor software change" would address the issue.
4. Did you catch what he said?
He said "underlying android operating system"
So you're telling me Dominion uses a Google operating system. The same Google that manipulates search results to favor Democrats. That Google?
Nothing to see here.
5. "The new software will have to be tested and approved by a third-party vendor, and then state election officials will have to load it onto 159 USB drives to be delivered to the counties"
apnews.com/article/electi…
6. So you're telling me there were randos all around the state of Georgia carrying who knows what loaded onto 159 USB drives and injecting the software payload into voting machines, had to literally reprogram the machines7 and no one thought it the least bit suspicious?
7. Did the state have to recertify these voting machines?
Did they even have the expertise to know exactly what happened?
Is there an audit log of who recertified what and on what basis?
8. “I mean, this is a mountain. It is not a mole hill,” David Cross, a lawyer representing several of the voters who filed the lawsuit, told judge Totenberg.
9. In a written declaration filed by the activists, J. Alex Halderman, a University of Michigan professor and a leading expert on election security, said “in complex computerized systems like Georgia’s election equipment, ......"
10. "..last-minute changes, even seemingly small ones, can introduce serious and difficult-to-foresee consequences. A change now would not leave enough time for rigorous testing and security measures, and..."
11. “....would provide an attractive vector for attackers seeking to spread malware,” he wrote.

Amazing isn't it?
12. In case you missed it. Here's what just happened 👇
13. In September Election officials in one county told them that, during preelection testing, the tabulation of absentee ballots did not work at all. And in another county, there was a problem with write-in candidates.
Verbatim from this article.
apnews.com/article/electi…
14. The explanation offered by Bryan Tyson, an attorney representing the state of Georgia:
"A 'misunderstanding' on the part of the local election officials and the other because a write-in candidate who has a number in his name while there are only letters on the keyboard"
15. In case you missed it:
The problems inherent in electronic systems, their vulnerabilities and ties to foreign actors was masterfully expounded upon by a Democrat 10 years ago. And we're still doing nothing while numbnuts with 159 USB drives run amok.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rising serpent 🇺🇸

Rising serpent 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rising_serpent

28 Nov
1. This is absolutely wild.
Did you know that the most comprehensive, detailed and well articulated exposal of the dangers inherent in the wdespread implementation of electronic voting systems came from a Democrat, and a it happened a decade ago way back in 2010?
2. John C. Bonifaz is an attorney and political activist specializing in constitutional law and voting rights. 
He also ran for Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 2006 as a Democrat.
(Just so we can dispense with the "right-wing conspiracy theory" right now)
3. On July 6th 2010 he highlighted to the Technical Guidelines Development Committee
and Its UOCAVA Working Group what is, in essence, the exact same concerns that the Trump team including @SidneyPowell1 @RudyGiuliani @LLinWood have repeatedly underscored over the last few weeks.
Read 35 tweets
18 Nov
1. The Danish mask study is probably the only Randomized controlled trial conducted so far to study mask efficacy to prevent COVID. Blinding was of course not possible.
Remember that randomized trials provide superior data compared to observational ones.
acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M2…
2. The primary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the mask wearer at 1 month by antibody testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), or hospital diagnosis.
3. A total of 3030 participants were randomly assigned to the recommendation to wear *surgical* masks, and 2994 were assigned to control; 4862 completed the study. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%).
Read 13 tweets
10 Nov
1. Since 2019, Perkins Coie has been paid at least $41 million for its political work by Democratic-affiliated organizations, according to Federal Election Commission records.
2. If you don't know who or what Perkins Coie is, think of them as the biggest clearing clearing house for the most repugnant Orcs.
I wrote about them many years ago.
3. Think of Marc Elias as the unfortunate result of what happens when an orc impregnates Brian Stelter. Except much more odious, bombastic pompous and vacuous. And just as big and insensate a Democrat controlled phallic toy.
Of course he's a super lawyer.
perkinscoie.com/en/professiona…
Read 24 tweets
9 Nov
I cannot overstate the importance of this thread. It's technical but well worth reading and rereading to understand the gravity of what's being said.
Large orders of magnitude data tends to follow a normal distribution.
Observing anomalies in distribution gives crucial insight.
1. To simplify it the best I can:
In person voting tends to not have a simplistic Democrat versus Republican linear distribution along a mean when you plot all votes. Because there are regional variations, families work together, as to friends with similar political persuasions.
2. On the other hand mailing ballots tend to have a fairly homogenous and almost linear distribution when plotted on a Democrat versus Republican X and Y axis distribution
Read 8 tweets
23 Oct
1. The only way to end the pandemic is through, not around it.
We were supposed to flatten the curve in 21 days. Fast forward 213 days and we're still talking about lockdowns, mask mandates and school and business closures and virus spikes.
2. If lockdowns worked, we wouldn't be where we're today. If masks were the silver bullet panacea they are being made out to be, we would have flattened the curve right after Fauci, CDC and the surgeon General changed their minds and insisted all of us begin using them.
3. In fact in one CDC case series majority of people getting infected wore masks all the time.
To be clear, I'm not saying they have zero efficacy, I'm saying they're not likely to make a significant impact on disease incidence, because their efficacy is at at best mild.
Read 25 tweets
21 Oct
Sorry to do this to you Jerome.
1. The "study" was observational and retrospective.
2. The*total* sample size was 314, including 154 case patients and 160 control participants. As of today there have been 8.3 million infected.
154 is not representative of 8.3 million.
Continued...
3. 71% of case patients and 74% of control participants reported always using cloth or other mask face coverings when in public. This is verbatim from the report. There's no statistical difference between mask use between these two groups
Continued...
4. More interesting, 42% of case patients reported close contact with an infected person compared to 14% of control participants, statistically significant p-value (p less than 0.01)
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!