@andreas_krieg has a sad habit of peddling third rate Qatari and Islamist propaganda. In this dismal essay he blames the UAE for “merging the narratives about ‘Islamism’ with ‘terrorism’.” I hate to break it to Krieg but #Islamism does indeed merge with #terrorism. I pity him.
After 30 years of experience with Islamist networks, I find it grotesque, distasteful, disingenuous, horrific that a whole cadre of superficially educated western scholars-for-hire continue to hold a candle for Islamist fascism and expect us Muslim to accept it. We will not.
The tactics and stunts of Islamist groups inspired by the Muslim Brotherhood are nothing new, so Krieg and his ilk need to stop pretending that all of us are oblivious to how Islamist networks function, support, interpenetrate, dovetail and coalesce with extremism and terrorism.
From the genesis of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, and in Saudi Arabia (before being banned), and in Jordan, Libya, Turkey, Tunisia, Syria, Iraq, Malaysia, and its front organisations in Europe/North America—the story of Islamist quest for power, hate and control is the same.
The Muslim world and its communities elsewhere are in an existential war with Islamism—against a suffocating ideological worldview that glorifies intellectual mediocrity, encourages hate speech, promotes violence, and wants to impose a leviathan monster upon all and sundry.
Islamists are not your pluralism-interfaith-diversity-democracy-loving neighbour. They are its exact opposite, which is why they cannot disconnect from extremism and terrorism. So please, western “scholars”, spare us the sanctimonious drivel of repackaged Islamism-lite.
And what great gift has Islamism thus far offered to Muslims or the world? Its theology is unsophisticated and shallow by Islamic standards; its lacks depth in virtually all the Islamic intellectual sciences; its spiritual psychology is unrefined; ...
it has no pedigree in philosophy, art, logic, poetry, music, architecture—all key components of the Islamic civilisation. Its modern take on the social sciences is equally dismal, with mediocre books that they pass as “Islamic”. Who are they kidding? Why should any Muslim buy it?
We have civilisation that has produced polymaths in all fields of human endeavour like Ghazali, Ibn Sina, Ibn Rush, Rumi, Biruni, Ibn Arabi, Ibn Ataillah, Zarruq, Al-Razi, Ibn Khaldun—and instead we have to pretend that our apex is reached with Mawdudi, Banna, Qutb or Khomeini?
Islamism did not define our past, or our present, and will not define our future. It doesn't have in its DNA what it takes to rebuild a compassionate civilisation or an ethos that respects diversity, knowledge and progress. Islam is a way of life, not an ideology.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sohail Nakhooda

Sohail Nakhooda Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @snakhooda

25 Apr 19
@qdepim @burweila @tmafaisal 1) You are right Quentin to caution such an approach, whoever we cannot also dismiss it because the affinities & interlinkages in theology & political between the more violent purveyors of Islamism and the grandmaster of Islamism itself, the MB, are also present and discernible.
@qdepim @burweila @tmafaisal 2) There is also a discernible linkage between Wahhabism/Salafism with the MB, in that both share an underlying theological understanding of vital elements of what constitutes Islam, and this affinity at the theological level (setting aside politics for now) explains much.
@qdepim @burweila @tmafaisal 3) Here what I mean is that Salafi groups and MB groups at local and national levels have since the 70s been able to cooperate easily in multifaceted ways not just because of pragmatic reasons but because they shared certain theological view of what Islam constituted essentially.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!