The actual Bell vs Tavistock judgment:
1) Children under 16 can only get puberty blockers if they are able to consent.
2) That is enormously difficult.
In other words: Don't even think about it.
#KeiraBell
judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
1) Children under 16 can only get puberty blockers if they are able to consent.
2) That is enormously difficult.
In other words: Don't even think about it.
#KeiraBell
judiciary.uk/wp-content/upl…
Court ruling on a child's ability to consent to puberty blockers by age:
13 and under: highly unlikely to be competent to consent
14-15: doubtful they could understand risks & consequences
16 and over: doctors might want prior authorisation of the court
#IStandWithKeiraBell
13 and under: highly unlikely to be competent to consent
14-15: doubtful they could understand risks & consequences
16 and over: doctors might want prior authorisation of the court
#IStandWithKeiraBell
To his previous "dark money funds feminists" delusion, Jolyon Maugham now adds the "dark web", where 11-year-old girls in droves will obviously be heading to purchase their puberty blockers with their bitcoin accounts.
Oooh, so dark.
Oooh, so dark.
This is repugnant from Jolyon Maugham.
A court judgment protecting children's bodily integrity IS NOT like the Holocaust in which 6 million Jews were murdered.
Don't know what made him lose his mind over transgender issues, but he has crossed a line, and there's no way back.
A court judgment protecting children's bodily integrity IS NOT like the Holocaust in which 6 million Jews were murdered.
Don't know what made him lose his mind over transgender issues, but he has crossed a line, and there's no way back.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
