I recommend The Intercept's newsletter just for their hilariously disingenuous fundraising emails. This billionaire-funded news outlet that employs some of the most overpaid people in the business has "Devastating News" -- it needs your money to save journalism:
The Intercept says it needs to raise $900,000. A few ideas:
-TI's editor in chief, a "Soft, Loose Collusion" Truther (
) who oversaw Reality Winner & other debacles, makes close to $500,000
-James Risen makes $305,000 to write Russiagate fan fiction
-They pay additionally obscene salaries for other columnists and op-ed writers that few people read
-The rent on their Park Avenue office -- with 360-degree panoramic views of New York City (I've sent it, it's lovely) -- would by itself sustain many mid-sized news outlets
The reason TI needs your money isn't to save investigative journalism. It's to ensure that they don't lose their 501(c)3 status & become billionaire Pierre Omidyar's private charitable foundation. It's scam fundraising in the name of saving journalism. Staggering dishonesty.
I don't mean to disparage the solid reporters who work there. On domestic politics TI reporters do valuable work. But as the forced departure of its founder recently exemplified, at the top it's become a left-punching, fake-adversarial site, & anything but a journalism savior.
.@NaomiAKlein, author of many great books including the definitive one about deceptive branding, "No Logo", lends her brand to The Intercept's fraudulent fundraising campaign. The billionaire-funded outlet, Naomi says, needs our money "to keep the lights on."
If you want to support independent journalism, there are so many independent outlets that:
A) actually need the money, because none have a billionaire funder like The Intercept
B) actually produce consistent independent journalism
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BBC podcast "Mayday" tries to repair the reputation of Syria's White Helmets & their late founder. It also tries to discredit the OPCW whistleblowers. It does so with glaring falsehoods & omissions. Host @chloehadj pledged to answer my Qs, but hasn't yet: thegrayzone.com/2020/11/30/que…
I have outlined here just some of the major falsehoods, leaps of logic, and omissions in @chloehadj's series. If the BBC stands by this reporting, then I expect that it will welcome the opportunity to answer my questions.
.@JHWeissmann claimed Roger Stone/Trump camp “coordinated” w/ Wikileaks; mocked Russiagate critics; & asked: “what do they think they were right about?”
When we answered his Q by pointing out that his Stone claim is 100% bullshit, he complained about us being in his mentions:
.@JHWeissmann’s cowardly complaint is joined by @ryanlcooper, who will emerge from his #BlueAnon hole to take digs at us on here and in error-ridden columns but then scurry away whenever challenged to substantiate the xenophobic Russiagate conspiracy theory he’s bought into.
Really incredible to see a top US official admit, and then top US journalists celebrate, that the elected President was deliberately misled on troop levels in order to help continue the US military occupation in Syria.
Spoke to Tucker Carlson on Fox News last night about why James Jeffrey's open admission of undermining Trump's call for a US withdrawal from Syria is all the more reason for Trump to carry one out before he leaves office:
Here is the May 2020 comment of the now former US envoy James Jeffrey that I referenced, in which he described his job in Syria as follows: "My job is to make it a quagmire for the Russians."
.@ggreenwald on the absurdity of ex-colleagues' smears: "The Intercept is a place probably more so than anywhere else in media where you make an obscene amount of money, for doing very little if you want... Money is the reason to stay at the Intercept."
The point here is not to criticize anyone for working at The Intercept, even their insanely overpaid writers who produce shitty and/or very little work. The point is to rebut criticism that Glenn left The Intercept for financial reasons or a "marketing opportunity."
In fact, a side issue here is that there are hard-working reporters at The Intercept who make relatively small salaries, compared to more well-known personalites earn hundreds of thousands of dollars for producing little work, & in the case of James Risen, Russiagate fan fiction.
Sad to see @NaomiAKlein not only trying to whitewash the censorship of Glenn & the valid critiques he raises of The Intercept's sad, Russiagate-addled turn, but even trying to fundraise for their billionaire-owned outlet off of it.
The idea that Glenn leaving his lucrative, secure job & claiming censorship is really "a marketing ploy" is just so disingenuous. Glenn is actually showing bravery & journalistic integrity -- underscoring that it's The Intercept that has used those values as a marketing ploy.
Imagine trying to exploit the departure of a principled journalist in order to raise more money for your billionaire-owned news outlet -- and then having the gall to accuse *him* of a "marketing ploy":
), let's look at those who tried to accuse others of doing what Bellingcat in fact did themselves, and even gloated that the falsely premised article was some kind of vindication.
Let's start with @bellingcat's @N_Waters89, a likely author of the anonymously bylined & discredited Bellingcat piece.
Nick has deleted a number of tweets, but luckily I saved them for us. #Bellingcaught