1/12 The absurd desire some liberals & progressives have to reach out to Trump's base (even those who believe the Q shit or think COVID's a hoax) stems from 1 of 3 things: either an intellectual arrogance that says we're so smart we can explain facts to folks & they'll change...
2/12 Or (for the more lefty types) a naive romanticization of 'salt of the earth' white people (especially those deemed working class), whom we still view in Steinbeckian terms, and who we think can be made to see their 'real enemies' are the millionehhhs and the billionehhhs...
3/12 Or an emotional neediness to be liked by everyone and have everyone get along because we don't like conflict. Notice the right doesn't play this game: they just steamroll folks. They deploy power. We fear it, because it seems mean or undemocratic or something...
4/12 What we must understand is that there are millions of people who hate everything we believe in. And they always will. As someone who gets weekly death threats from these types, I've come to accept this and no longer fear them. Their hatreds define them, give them life...
5/12 ...every second you spend trying to save or convert them is a second you don't spend mobilizing those who believe in justice and equity and fairness to exercise power. It's a loser move: a move of people who think they are outnumbered but are not...
6/12 A move by people who don't really have the courage to just use their power. A move by people who don't want the other side to have a sad because their compassion for the people who hate them is stronger than their compassion for the people THOSE PEOPLE hurt...
7/12 At some point liberals & the left will have to understand: we are not on this Earth to be therapists to horribly damaged right wing authoritarians. You can't save everyone. Stop trying. Get comfortable with defeating people, without apology, over and over again...
8/12 Will doing so anger the right? Yes. Will some lash out, even violently? Yes. But they are doing that now. If we refuse to really defeat people for fear they might backlash, we can never get a more just society bc we'll always fear the other side's reaction...
9/12 They are counting on this. They want to scare us into not governing, not flexing even when we have the numbers to do so. They hope their bluster and their threats will scare us back into "bipartisanship" or "coalition building" efforts that include people like them...
10/12 Even as they would never do this for us and have no intention of really being part of such coalitions. Are some individuals capable of changing their minds/hearts? Yes. But basing our strategies around snagging the statistical handful of those for our side is foolishness...
11/12 Those amenable to reason will come over w/o us having to prostrate ourselves for them. Others will come over bc they shift w/the winds of power and want to be on the winning side. Fine. Come on along...
12/12 ...Others will fight to the death. At which point the ONLY important thing is making sure they do the dying (politically speaking), not you. Shorter version: stop trying to be team Harmony. Just be the 1927 Yankees and get comfortable beating the crap out of the other side.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ White conservatives like to tell Black folks to "stop wallowing in victimhood" by talking about racism. But they literally marinate in grievance and a sense of their own victimhood as a matter of daily routine. Let's count all the ways they feel victimized shall we? ...
2/ Even before Trump they insisted they were the victims of taxes, secular humanists, feminism, "radical Islam," political correctness, affirmative action, welfare cheats, immigrants taking their jobs, government regulations, auto emissions laws, militant LGBTQ activists...
3/ ...a ban on organized school prayer, the Endangered Species Act, the liberal media, Hollywood liberals, Obamacare, a ban on assault weapons, and background checks for gun purchases, rampant crime (even though it's fallen by more than 1/2 since the early 90s)...
1/ If u wouldn't spend time/energy reaching out to folk who believe Pizzagate BS or that the DNC killed Seth Rich or Obama isn't American, why would you spend time/energy reaching out to those who think Trump 'won in a landslide' but the election was stolen? All are irrational...
2/ Literally every second you waste trying to bring these people to the light of reason is a second you could be spending organizing those who already lean progressive, or at least comprise the current anti-Trump coalition into more progressive formations...
3/ I will never understand the irrational faith in the power of pure reason so common among typical liberals. The idea that if we just show people the facts, the data, or put together the right class analysis, they'll switch and vote their "self interest"...
1/ Grifter @SidneyPowell1 and her Q-addled fan base apparently think that just bc you file a lawsuit w/affidavits from people, that constitutes "evidence" sufficient to invalidate the votes of millions. It doesn't. People can say anything in an affidavit for a court filing...
2/ Punishment for this kind of perjury is mild and not likely anyway, plus in prior such examples already discussed in court in MI and PA, the court found the affidavit claims to be not credible, based on misunderstanding, etc., even if not deliberately deceptive...
3/ Lots of these GOP "poll watchers" skipped the training they were supposed to get first, so they didn't understand the process and how it works...as such they thought things they witnessed that were exactly proper were actually pernicious. Because they're gullible idiots...
1/ The SCOTUS decision in favor of the "religious freedom" to gather in large groups despite the pandemic is part of a larger effort to elevate so called religious liberty above all other freedoms, but not in the way most agree with...
2/ Most everyone would agree that people's right to worship as they see fit should be protected, to believe as they wish, free from persecution, etc. That is not what this is, or what other religious liberty cases are about...
3/ These cases are about elevating the rights of persons claiming to be acting on the basis of religious belief, to engage in activity that injures others, without consequence. So here it means the right to worship in large groups even if it endangers public health...
1/ Let's be honest: how many of you "reasonable" conservatives imploring Dems to reach across the aisle and make nice with Trump voters would have demanded that Trump voters to do the same if he had won? And what are the odds they would have listened to you? Yeah, so...be gone...
2/And if he were to somehow convince GOP state legislatures to submit GOP electors to the EC to steal the election (he won't, but play along), how many of you would demand such GOP ecumenism? Or be in the streets demanding his removal? Gimme a break...
3/ In that scenario Kasich, Santorum & writers like Thiessen & Olsen would be saying they wish he hadn't done it that way but gosh the Constitution allows it, and maybe if the left hadn't talked about the Green New Deal and Medicare 4 All it wouldn't have been necessary but gee..
1/ I've heard some conjuring the notion of restorative justice to suggest we have an obligation to reach out to Trump voters and offer them the opportunity to rejoin the beloved community, to understand them, etc. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of how RJ works...
2/ The concept is not a "get out of jail free" card for one's transgressions. It is not an absolution ticket one can wield so as to let bygones be bygones. RJ requires that those who injure take responsibility and make amends for their actions (in this case injuring so many)...
3/ AND RJ presumes that those who are injured have the primary say over what the transgressor needs to do. So this means that in order to apply RJ to Trump voters they must...