Chairman @RepMcGovern begins by saying it's a historic day, because the rules committee is addressing marijuana reform. #cannabisnews
GOP Rep. Rob Woodall says that if we refuse to enforce federal laws, we should repeal those laws.
Adds though that he has letters from AAA and the Surgeon General saying there are still worries about fully reforming marijuana reform.
Rep @JacksonLeeTX18 says the #MOREAct is “not to promote drug use” but to “provide justice."
Two lawmakers have already quoted Martin Luther King Jr. in this hearing on marijuana policy reform. Jackson Lee says "if not now, then when?"
GOP Lawmaker @RepBenCline says #MOREAct could have been a bipartisan bill, and asks for the committee to pass an open rule so that there can be more debate on this bill on the House floor.
He adds it was “jammed” through Judiciary and Ways & Means committees.
Cline says #marijuana should be rescheduled, not descheduled. (aka moved to a less strict classification)
Cline, a former prosecutor, says he is not in favor of expungements. He says it sets a dangerous precedent and isn't fair to people who "obeyed the law."
Note: data show Black ppl are arrested 4x more than white ppl for weed despite equal rates of obeying/not obeying the law.
Cline is correct in saying that there was not a Judiciary Committee hearing specifically on the #MOREAct. There was a broad hearing on marijuana reform, but it was held 13 days before the MORE Act was introduced. The MORE Act only had a markup (aka vote), in November.
Woodall points out that there are no regs in this bill re: children.
A number of states have such laws, and if this bill had a chance of becoming law this cycle, I would not be surprised if lang. was added at least instructing FDA to deal w/packaging, flavors, edibles etc.
Republicans keep bringing up logical issues and then pivot them to call for a broader rule on this bill — aka open up the bill for discussion on the floor this week.
That would take more time, when there are just a few more days left to legislate.
We've had our first historical reference to alcohol prohibition and bootleggers, courtesy of @RepRaskin.
Rep Mary Scanlon says that while she worries about impact on children, her district recently decriminalized (penn has legalized medical) and that means she needs to advocate for what her voters want.
That's definitely a common narrative among lawmakers.
Wow! Did NOT realize that @DonnaShalala once oversaw the single federally-licensed research marijuana grow at the University of Mississippi when she was Secretary of HHS — you learn something new every day!
Every Democrat is mentioning systemic racism and criminal justice reform as the motivation for passing this bill.
Hemp was legalized in 2018 farm bill to give a new crop to farmers who are $$ struggling.
That is not what this bill is — this is a criminal justice reform bill.
After listening to an hour of testimony, it's clear that the Republican tone to legalization isn't "weed is evil and will kill our children" but "we need to change the federal status of marijuana, this but not in this way."
Democrats, meanwhile, are saying yes — we need more research, and there are worries to sort out... but we have to remove the criminality on this now, because it's hurting people while we wait around to sort out the research.
"What I can tell you, in my neighborhood, it will diminish the death," said Rep @JacksonLeeTX18, and a pretty powerful bit of testimony. "The killing of small timers, dealing with marijuana sales and losing their life."
Chairman @RepMcGovern adds: "When people ask me what is systemic racism, I point to our drug laws in this country."
That's a pretty strong statement in a year where criminal justice reform and systemic racism has been one of the most important topics in the nation. #cannabis
Rep @repblumenauer — the unofficial #cannabis czar on the Hill — is here now, to give testimony.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The House Rules Committee hearing on the #MOREAct (the marijuana policy reform bill) will start at 1pm. There are 5 amendments submitted for consideration.
Some are administrative: clarifying SBA language and allowing DOT and Coast Guard to drug test. [1/]
.@RepDanBishop's amendment would not allow the MORE Act be enacted until DOT developed a way to test if drivers impaired by marijuana use — the research for that is already underway, and could take years longer. The amendment gives the DOT 180 days. amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/12.…
Florida @RepMattGaetz's amendment would remove the social equity funding, programs, grants and studies from the bill.
Gaetz has already voted for the MORE Act, in the judiciary committee last year. He's told me that he is more pro-STATES Act, however.
“...The records show that he depends more and more on making money from businesses that put him in potential and often direct conflict of interest with his job as president.”
FYI: Reports that a marijuana research bill may come to a floor vote next week may not be true. It's listed on the House docs site, but I just heard from a reliable source there might have been a clerical error. Waiting for further confirmation one way or another. #cannabisnews
UPDATE: the Medical Marijuana Research Act has been removed from the docs.house.gov "may vote" list. Still no word from House leadership but this seems to confirm what I was told about it being an error. #cannabisnews
NEW: Hoyer’s office confirmed the medical marijuana research bill is not on the floor next week. #CannabisCommunity
Two weeks ago, this bill was about criminal justice reform and showing what Dems can do ahead of the Nov 3 election. Then Republicans used it to bludgeon them over the lack of a coronavirus aid package. politico.com/news/2020/09/1…
Moderates say their problem isn’t with the marijuana bill — it’s on the lack of a coronavirus deal.
“The focus of constituents — the real call for action, the real unmet needs out there — are emergency relief for the pandemic,” @AnthonyBrownMD4 told me earlier this week.