This is a story about #covid19bc messaging and #BCEd schools. In the @Fraserhealth exposure letter that parents in my twins' school received, it states that Covid is only transmitted via droplets. Recall that stuffy classes contain 30 people and as few as <10 wearing masks. 👇
I went to the @CDCofBC site & found this comparison, stating that droplets spread @Covid19bc. Aerosols are connected w/ other conditions. Researchers/ experts have been weighing in on this topic for weeks (I'm not the researcher. My professional research interests lie elsewhere.)
On the US @cdc site you find this info RE aerosols & HVAC issues. This research is acknowkedged in BC. It's why gyms and dance studios are under review & likely why Dr. Tam @CPHO_Canada suggests a 3 layer mask indoors during winter months. (See following tweet for 2nd part. )
Stuffy rooms, no PPE and passage of time enable this less common form of transmission. Note that touching surfaces - discussed often RE #BCEd schools - is a less common form of transmission. Why are the Fraser Health letter & BC CDC site not listing up-to-date research findings?
Which BC or CDN journalist will be asking Minister @adriandix (maybe not for the first time) why this critical omission has not been addressed? It's not hard to update a website or letter document. I've given up on contacting politicians and senior @bced people.
I've shared a link to this thread on Facebook - focussing on the lack of up-to-date information. You can find it and reshare it here: bit.ly/2VqM4Cb
And if you would like to address your school concerns to the new #BCEd Minister, her Twitter account is JM [underscore] Whiteside
. @TeriMooring The Covid Exposure letter I got includes a write-up that is months out of date. A more accurate statement would change the narrative RE how BCTF requests for improved safety standards are needed.Please see thread. Has Fraser Health been asked to update the letter?
. @SoniaFurstenau not a solution but it's a critical ommission that needs to be fixed. Is there a MLA who could look into this inaccurate info that is going out in the Covid Exposure letters to parents? Pls see thread.
While officials and at least 2 apologist journalists were lobbing insults at constituents in order to stop the influx of uncomfortable questions, I was saying it's NOT OK that misinformation was sent to me - a parent - as part of a Covid Exposure letter.
The big #RedFlagCovidBC: By publishing misinformation (defined as out-of-date), BC officials crossed a line. The vast majority of British Columbians who are non-plussed by this are also crossing a line, offering a blank cheque in their name. And we point our fingers at the US?!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This has been my question for years. Why don't BC journalists cover issue X or Y? Especially those stories about the welfare of children. You do see important topics sometimes but the vast majority of stories remain untold while a few stories seem to get a spotlight repeatedly.👇
And I'm always interested in reach. If i have to dig deep to find a story - if I don't cross paths with it in my daily travels - the coverage doesn't have legs. But then there's also the issue of the interest of readers. 👇
I wrote about misinformation that the government has in print. I could barely muster up interest. Do we not care about being fed misinformation by officials - *in writing* when similar health agencies elsewhere are sharing peer reviewed scientific research?bit.ly/2VDvmjb