In this endless speech of lies and nonsense, Trump holds up a graphic that I described as an "unusually easy" thing to debunk when I did so two weeks ago. washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/…
Anyway, now we know what he's been doing for four weeks.
"The mail-in voting scam is the latest part of their four year effort to overturn the results of the 2016 election," Trump says of the 2020 election.
It's just ... what do you say to that?
Was the 2020 election an attempt by Democrats to see a different result from 2016? It was!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The vote for President Trump was 'so overwhelming' that it 'broke the algortihm' that had been programmed, we are told by ... Michael Flynn's attorney. This was a function of 'communist money.'
Totally bonkers and nonsensical.
As I was typing this, Soros was looped in.
If your goal is to present a believable case for how the election results are suspect, you should not have Sidney Powell offering up theories that would make Alex Jones be like "maybe dial it back".
Show me actual evidence that there was enough fraud to swing the results in even one state — or even *close* to swinging the results — and I'll take this seriously.
That's all I ask.
Just to clarify:
• Not having as many observers as you want as votes are counted is not fraud.
• Unsubstantiated and unquantified accusations are not proof of fraud. Neither are debunked ones.
Oh, yes, I meant to add that sworn affidavits that don't actually show any fraud are also not germane to my point.