There are many possible reasons violent crime has spiked this year. Record unemployment. Social upheaval from a pandemic. Mistrust of police. Mistrust of government.

The least likely explanation: defunding the police. Because it hasn’t really happened.
A few cities did immediately abolish some specialty units. But among the dozen or so jurisdictions that cut police funding, most cut only a small percentage, and from what I’ve seen, none of the cuts took effect until FY 2021, which began 10/1. The crime surge began much earlier.
Ah, opponents of police reform say. But the protests still could have spurred the surge in violence, either by encouraging anarchy and mayhem, or by angering police and triggering a de-policing Ferguson Effect.”

So let’s look at crime this year in specific cities:
The surge in murders in NYC began in April, and got much worse in in May. The first George Floyd protest in the city was on May 28.

www1.nyc.gov/site/nypd/news…
In Chicago, 2020 homicides have outpaced 2019 all year, starting in January.

chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/…
Houston was at a 50% increase in homicides over last year on May 7, nearly three weeks before George Floyd was killed.

google.com/amp/s/www.usne…
DC was already seeing a spike in shootings and assaults back in April.

google.com/amp/s/www.wash…
Indianapolis was looking at a 23 percent increase in homicides by the end of May.

google.com/amp/s/amp.indy…
Kansas City started to see a spike in homicides in early May.

google.com/amp/s/amp.kans…
In mid-May, Milwaukee had more than doubled its homicide total over the same time last year.

google.com/amp/s/amp.json…
Philly homicides were up 26 percent over last year as of March.

inquirer.com/news/murder-ho…..
At the end of April, Cincinnati had a 115 percent increase in homicides over last year.

spectrumnews1.com/oh/columbus/ne…
There are some exceptions. In Atlanta and Columbus, murders only began to increase over last year after the protests.

But these attempts I’m seeing to blame the nationwide increase in violent crime on protests, “defunding,” and police reform just don’t hold up to scrutiny.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Radley Balko

Radley Balko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @radleybalko

10 Nov
So shortly after the 2016 election, I pointed out how odd it was that the Reason homepage was dominated by stories either mocking and ridiculing the left for being fearful of what was to come, or articles about how Trump might actually be good for libertarians.
Now, in 2020, we have one party so upset about the election, they’re openly fomenting a crisis of democracy. Here’s the Reason homepage today. There’s one article about all of that. There’s a hell of a lot more about the threat posed by Joe Biden. And more riciduling the left. Image
I’m picking on Reason. And I’ll add that there are people there who have sufficiently grasped the threat the last four years, despite the general editorial direction of the magazine. But it really underscores the disappointment I’ve had with my fellow libertarians in general ...
Read 13 tweets
9 Nov
A few links on the nonsense claim that Benford’s Law proves “irregularities” in the Biden vote tallies.

First, it’s far from clear that Benford’s Law is useful for detecting election fraud:

cambridge.org/core/journals/…
Second, even if it were, district level tallies are likely too fragmented for the law to apply. When you aggregate the data into larger geographical groupings, it’s fine:

alpha-xone.medium.com/do-bidens-vote…
Third, the posts you’ve probably seen on this have manipulated the data.

There’s also lots more discussion of the first two points at the link.

skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/4978…
Read 4 tweets
4 Oct
These accounts of utter recklessness among Trump’s inner circle are jaw dropping.

But one thing about them I find puzzling: Trump is a notorious germaphobe. He’s also a coward. And his conversations with Woodward make clear that he knew COVID was both dangerous and airborne.
So I’ve just assumed all along that as he publicly played down the virus for political reasons, he was taking every precaution to protect himself. Like those rallies where everyone around him was required to mask up, but no one else was.

This of course would be consistent...
... with Trump’s general habit of going through life thinking he plays by a different set of rules.

So what happened? The best explanation I can come up with is some combination of him thinking his “great genes” made him impervious to COVID, and that he started to believe his...
Read 5 tweets
25 Sep
When the Hudson v. Michigan decision came down, many of us predicted it would basically unleash cops to render the knock & announce requirement all but meaningless. That's exactly what happened. See Louisville:

washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
Read 11 tweets
24 Sep
So a few years ago, @ScottGreenfield, @Volokh, @Popehat and others wrote about a case involving Texas magistrate named Dwight Goains.

A woman said DEA agents had beaten her while raiding her sister's store. A friend posted photos and an account on Facebook.

Goains was ...
... in charge of setting the store owner's bail. He granted it, but with crazy conditions: The sister had to get the guy who posted the story on FB to take it all down. She also had to make a public apology in two newspapers, admit the raid was ...

blog.simplejustice.us/2014/05/23/gag…
... legitimate, and state that her sister is the one who assaulted the DEA agents.

So as it turns out, Goains was a defense attorney before he was a magistrate. He represented defendants in capital cases. The problem: He wasn't very good at that, either.

Ready for the kicker?
Read 4 tweets
23 Sep
This is wrong and willfully misleading. It was absolutely a no-knock warrant (and an illegal one at that).

The cops just claimed they changed their mind at the scene. And yes, ONE neighbor said he heard police announce ONE time. 11 other neighbors heard no announcement at all.
If 11 of 12 neighbors in an apartment building didn’t hear an announcement, then the announcement clearly didn’t provide sufficient notice. Notice is the whole point of the knock & announce requirement.

Which means this was indistinguishable from a no-knock raid.
The question is, why would Walker, a registered gun owner who had nothing to hide, knowingly fire on police officers?

The answer is he didn’t. The cops know he didn’t. Cameron knows he didn’t. If they thought otherwise, they wouldn’t have dropped the attempted murder charges.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!