A few minutes of digging reveals who he really is: not a blue-collar freedom-fighter but a kid from one of Canada's richest neighbourhoods, whose dad owned the property on which he ran his faux-Texan smokehouse.
If you've eaten at his joint or read the reviews, you know his schtick: the fetishization of Lone Star realness. Meticulous recreation of Texas "authenticity" not just in the food but in the room and in his persona.
It's a Disneyland simulation and he's the princess.
Like his media champion Rex Murphy, he's a privileged guy performing as Joe Sixpack. Plaid flannels, backwards cap, scraggly beard. It's a costume I might throw together at the last minute if I forgot it was halloween.
It's embarrassing how effective this routine was.
The trope:
"Hard-working man just tryin' to feed his baby"
Turned too many people into weepy sentimental losers.
Truth is, his restaurants (no table service, no booze, food travels well as take-out) was uniquely well-suited to survive the pandemic.
His politics were misunderstood and misreported.
We were told – here's a man standing up for the little guy. An act of civil disobedience against laws that protect multinationals and punish regular folk.
Which is valid. But that's not the principle he was standing up for.
Just read his tweets. Before his confused ramblings about flaws in the testing and unfair shutdown policies, he shared his baseline position:
COVID does not kill *enough* people for him to have to close his restaurant.
The death-count isn't "significant."
Now that the smoke has cleared, the question we're left with is not about him but about us: why is the media (and the public it supposedly represents & serves) SO responsive to this particular trope?
Why do we accept his archetype as the default or "real" Canadian?
...and why is it so much harder for us to invest as much attention or empathy into the thousands of small business owners who actually ARE going under, but who are not white?
Craig & Marc Kielburger will testify at a Commons committee tomorrow. It's a rare opportunity to ask them Qs. They've never accepted our intvu requests or answered us directly & I'm unaware of either of them ever agreeing to an accountability intvu from another news org. (cont'd)
Still, I worry that the time will be squandered with partisan speechifying & an over-emphasis on the youth volunteer grant. I realize the grant is the focus, but larger questions about WE are clearly important in assessing the gov't's due diligence here, or lack thereof. (cont'd)
Watchdog @CharityCanada has published a good list of questions they would ask the Kielburgers. charityintelligence.ca/research-and-n… I'll add to those. Here's what I would ask the Kielburgers if I had them under oath:
Here's a story about #CancelCulture from one hundred years ago.
In 1920, Henry Ford was one of the most wealthy, powerful and respected men in America.
He was also a disgusting bigot who owned a newspaper.
Ford's Dearborn Independent ran a NINETY ONE part series, starting in 1920, called "The International Jew: The World's Problem."
It was heavily based on "The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion," which is Russian fake news from 1903. Many conspiracy theory idiots believed it to be the actual minutes from a secret meeting of the Jews who run the world (some still do).
1. Just posted a small but perhaps important update to our last story on WE Charity in Kenya.
I'll provide a bit of context on it here.
2. If you read the story, you know that we obtained a recording of Marc Kielburger on the phone in 2017 with the person who ran WE's Kenya operation, Peter Ruhiu. soundcloud.com/canadaland/i-c…
3. During the call, Ruhiu makes death threats about one of Kielburger's employees, talks about paying-off government investigators, and mentions their organization's "criminal offences." Marc listens calmly and agrees that the situation is "mission critical." He offers his help.